Chromatography Today 1991
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-88492-3.50004-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Relationships of Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
(250 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, the molecules of modifier create an active complex, with the surface silanols and also bind the released reaction by-products. Consequently, a packing with dense coverage is created [1,51]. According to Buszewski et al [8,18], changing both the nature and the concentration of the activator permits preparation of packings with controlled and homogeneous coverage.…”
Section: Reaction Activatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the molecules of modifier create an active complex, with the surface silanols and also bind the released reaction by-products. Consequently, a packing with dense coverage is created [1,51]. According to Buszewski et al [8,18], changing both the nature and the concentration of the activator permits preparation of packings with controlled and homogeneous coverage.…”
Section: Reaction Activatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatographic conditions were optimized on the basis of the resolution of tomatidine and acetylleptinidine, since these two alkaloids were the most difficult to separate. These conditions provided nearbaseline resolution of tomatidine and acetylleptinidine (R = 1.4; Table I) with an analysis time of less than 20 min (Figure 4); an Rvalue of 1.5 constitutes baseline separation (Poole and Schuette, 1984). Thus, these conditions provided a good compromise between resolution and analysis time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%