1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-00743-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of Electronic Imaging Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, this metric has only a loose correlation with percieved image quality [12]. Typical processing times for the single-pass algorithm are two seconds to enlarge a 100x100 image up to 200x200 pixels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, this metric has only a loose correlation with percieved image quality [12]. Typical processing times for the single-pass algorithm are two seconds to enlarge a 100x100 image up to 200x200 pixels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent attempts to improve on cubic spline interpolation [12,16,3] have met with limited success. Schreiber and collaborators [12] proposed a sharpened Gaussian interpolator function to minimize information spillover between pixels and optimize flatness in smooth areas. Schultz and Stevenson [13] have used a Bayesian method for super-resolution, but hypothesized the prior probability.…”
Section: Related Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reduction of noise using such techniques also often leads to the suppression of significant edge features. Since the presence of edges is perceptually related to sharpness and, hence, contrast [1], these approaches impact image quality significantly. There are smoothing methods that can also preserve edges, and Winkler et al [2] provide a good synopsis of such methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) corresponds to a squared error penalty for dierences between images. While this may be adequate for many applications, it is not a good model of the human visual system's response [57]. Our Bayesian framework can accomodate a dierent image error metric.…”
Section: Other Image Error Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%