The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of Human Mating Strategies

Abstract: In this chapter, evidence is reviewed regarding the reproductive strategies—and specialized mating psychologies—fundamental to humans. Cross‐species comparisons and ethnological patterns observed across foraging cultures help to clarify our most basic human mating adaptations. Overall, extant evidence suggests there is no single mating strategy in humans. Humans evolved a pluralistic mating repertoire that is facultatively responsive to sex, temporal contexts, personal characteristics such as mate value and ov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the trade-off between long-and short-term mate choice strategies (i.e. sex with or without commitment) has been a central issue in evolutionary psychology (Schmitt, 2005a), sociosexuality and its objective measurement have become important for this discipline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the trade-off between long-and short-term mate choice strategies (i.e. sex with or without commitment) has been a central issue in evolutionary psychology (Schmitt, 2005a), sociosexuality and its objective measurement have become important for this discipline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is for men and women to be adaptively designed to manifest relatively uniform sex differences across cultures. Evolutionary theories such as Sexual Selection Theory (Darwin 1871) and Parental Investment Theory (Trivers 1972) suggest that, as mammals, men and women likely pursue somewhat different mating strategies and at least some of the adaptive design of men's and women's evolved mating psychologies will be robustly manifested across cultures (Lippa 2005;Schmitt 2005a). According to Lippa (2009), sex differences in sex drive demonstrate a particularly persistent and uniform magnitude across all cultures and are entirely unrelated to factors such as degree of sex role socialization and sociopolitical gender equity.…”
Section: Obligate Sex Differences: Culturally Insensitive Sex-specifimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, our approach is based upon the recognition of a fundamental asymmetry between the sexes as to the role of sexual vs. emotional signals in promoting, in a given subject, a short-vs. long-term mating orientation-of course concurrently with a rich constellation of other kinds of factors [3]. The dynamic interaction schemes that we have introduced are original and are not found in the existing literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%