2001
DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4140400313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of performance technology: A guide to improving people, process, and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both separate context analysis from the analysis of content. In the performance improvement approach contextual factors play a dominant role in performance analysis and cause analysis (Van Tiem, Moseley & Dessinger, 2004). Rita C. Richey…”
Section: See Also Culture-neutral Design and Culture-specific Design mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both separate context analysis from the analysis of content. In the performance improvement approach contextual factors play a dominant role in performance analysis and cause analysis (Van Tiem, Moseley & Dessinger, 2004). Rita C. Richey…”
Section: See Also Culture-neutral Design and Culture-specific Design mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Stolovitch (2007, p. 142) it "has probably had the most global exposure" of any performance improvement model. It includes fi ve interrelated componentsperformance analysis, cause analysis, intervention selection, design and development, implementation and change management, and evaluation (Van Tiem, Moseley & Dessinger, 2004).…”
Section: See Also Competency Modeling and Development And Context Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be useful to revisit the functions of the performance measurement system (Kerssens-van Drongelen & Fisscher, 2003) so that analyses can support the intended purposes of the PMS. The human performance technology (HPT) model (Van Tiem, Moseley, & Dessinger, 2004) can also provide a context for understanding data analysis because performance analysis and cause analysis provide guidance for working with data as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used this information to identify intervention categories that we deemed relevant to practitioners and then analyze them to yield a specific list of interventions. The second stage of the review was a cross-comparative analysis of the Handbook of Human Performance Technology (Stolovitch & Keeps, 1999), Intervention Resource Guide (Langdon, Whiteside, & McKenna, 1999), Performance Intervention Maps (Sanders & Moseley, & Dessinger, 2004). We identified 25 specific interventions that were in agreement with the listings we obtained from the initial literature review and used these as the basis for designing the survey instrument.…”
Section: Interview Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%