“…However, rather than focusing on organizations’ use of external atrocities, as we do here, such research – often within the grander scope of business ethics – tends to focus on how atrocities are organized (in order to understand how they occur and thus to prevent them) (see, e.g., Cunha, Rego, & Clegg, 2010; Whelan, Moon, & Orlitzky, 2009) or how organizations attempt to manage harmful behavior (in order to neutralize the negative effect such conduct can have on the business) (see, e.g., Fooks, Gilmore, Collin, Holden, & Lee, 2012). Researchers have also dealt with how corporations – through for example fundraising or supporting a political cause – aim to present themselves as responsible and ethical as possible (Forstorp, 2007), but this research has rarely dealt directly with atrocities. In the cases where organizational research has dealt directly with the ethical aspects inherent in the organization of atrocities, it has often tended to focus on the reasons why these emerge (Bauman, 1999; ten Bos, 1997) or how a communication strategy regarding them is received in an organization (Borgerson, Schroeder, Magnusson, & Magnusson, 2009), and less how its meaning has been narrated by an organization not involved in committing the atrocity.…”