2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2007.00500.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundraising discourse and the commodification of the Other

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a sociological viewpoint, it has been proposed that mass media enables common social experience in heterogeneous societies by making the same information available to all. In the current context in which the mass media constantly cover current issues in terms of crises and perspective on this activity, in which the actions varied out by the companies are part of their business and, in that regard, are seen as part of the "commodification of the other" in the business of fundraising (Forstorp, 2007) or as a media show that exploits feelings of nationalism in order to control the threat to the social order stemming from the panic and sensationalism generated by media coverage (Korstanje and Fernandez-Montt, 2011).…”
Section: Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a sociological viewpoint, it has been proposed that mass media enables common social experience in heterogeneous societies by making the same information available to all. In the current context in which the mass media constantly cover current issues in terms of crises and perspective on this activity, in which the actions varied out by the companies are part of their business and, in that regard, are seen as part of the "commodification of the other" in the business of fundraising (Forstorp, 2007) or as a media show that exploits feelings of nationalism in order to control the threat to the social order stemming from the panic and sensationalism generated by media coverage (Korstanje and Fernandez-Montt, 2011).…”
Section: Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both in this study and that of McMellon and Long (2006), "image" ads were used most often. This might imply that companies primarily seek to bolster their reputation by using campaigns associated with a disaster, as some critics have proposed (Forstorp, 2007).…”
Section: Lessons Learned and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherent in the process of constructing, consuming, and accumulating authenticity is the commodification of the Other (Forstorp 2007). To commodify the Other entails turning the experiences of the Other into a commodity that can be marketed, bought, and collected.…”
Section: A Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rather than focusing on organizations’ use of external atrocities, as we do here, such research – often within the grander scope of business ethics – tends to focus on how atrocities are organized (in order to understand how they occur and thus to prevent them) (see, e.g., Cunha, Rego, & Clegg, 2010; Whelan, Moon, & Orlitzky, 2009) or how organizations attempt to manage harmful behavior (in order to neutralize the negative effect such conduct can have on the business) (see, e.g., Fooks, Gilmore, Collin, Holden, & Lee, 2012). Researchers have also dealt with how corporations – through for example fundraising or supporting a political cause – aim to present themselves as responsible and ethical as possible (Forstorp, 2007), but this research has rarely dealt directly with atrocities. In the cases where organizational research has dealt directly with the ethical aspects inherent in the organization of atrocities, it has often tended to focus on the reasons why these emerge (Bauman, 1999; ten Bos, 1997) or how a communication strategy regarding them is received in an organization (Borgerson, Schroeder, Magnusson, & Magnusson, 2009), and less how its meaning has been narrated by an organization not involved in committing the atrocity.…”
Section: The Management Of External Atrocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%