Fungal Identification Using Molecular Tools: A Primer for the Natural Products Research Community

Abstract

Fungi are morphologically, ecologically, metabolically, and phylogenetically diverse. They are known to produce numerous bioactive molecules, which makes them very useful for natural products researchers in their pursuit of discovering new chemical diversity with agricultural, industrial, and pharmaceutical applications. Despite their importance in natural products chemistry, identification of fungi remains a daunting task for chemists, especially those who do not work with a trained mycologist. The purpose of this review is to update natural products researchers about the tools available for molecular identification of fungi. In particular, we discuss (1) problems of using morphology alone in the identification of fungi to the species level; (2) the three nuclear ribosomal genes most commonly used in fungal identification and the potential advantages and limitations of the ITS region, which is the official DNA barcoding marker for species-level identification of fungi; (3) how to use NCBI-BLAST search for DNA barcoding, with a cautionary note regarding its limitations; (4) the numerous curated molecular databases containing fungal sequences; (5) the various protein-coding genes used to augment or supplant ITS in species-level identification of certain fungal groups; and (6) methods used in the construction of phylogenetic trees from DNA sequences to facilitate fungal species identification. We recommend that, whenever possible, both morphology and molecular data be used for fungal identification. Our goal is that this review will provide a set of standardized procedures for the molecular identification of fungi that can be utilized by the natural products research community.

Media studies to enhance the production of verticillins facilitated by in situ chemical analysis

“…Methods for BLAST search in NCBI GenBank and Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis, as utilized to identify fungal strains, have been detailed recently [61]. The BLAST search and phylogenetic analysis using taxon sampling [1] revealed that MSX59553, MSX79542, MSX74391, MSX58124, MSX75296, MSX75281, MSX45374, and MSX70777 belong to the genus Clonostachys (Ascomycota, Hypocreales, Bionectriaceae), while MSX71844 was identified as Purpureocillium lavendulum (Ascomycota, Hypocreales, Ophiocordycipitaceae) (Fig.…”

Human Pathogenic Paecilomyces from Food

“…Mycologists have traditionally used morphological characters to identify fungi to the species level but they can often be mislead due to hybridization, cryptic speciation, and convergent evolution [11]. Molecular tools (DNA sequence-based methods) have been useful to solving doubts in the identification process at the species level.…”

Peach Brown Rot: Still in Search of an Ideal Management Option

“…In all, it has been recommended [96] that additional research of new primers and probes for the characterization of Monilinia species should be conducted to make the method more transferable among qPCR platforms and laboratories [96]. We refer to Raja et al [104] for more information on the merits and demerits of the use of "molecular tools" in fungi detection and identification.…”