Effectors in Plant–Microbe Interactions 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119949138.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal Secondary Metabolites: Ancient Toxins and Novel Effectors in Plant–Microbe Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because these cells initially remain alive, such molecules are probably not toxins and may instead function in host manipulation, similar The P values were calculated using a onesided Fisher's exact test and represent the probability of observing the number of significantly induced genes for a specific category during a transition given the total number of significantly induced genes during that transition (log2 fold change >2, P < 0.05) and the total number of genes in the category. npg l e t t e r s to protein effectors 27 . Remarkably, the C. higginsianum secondary metabolism gene cluster with the strongest activation at this stage was silent in C. graminicola at all the infection stages we examined (Fig.…”
Section: E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these cells initially remain alive, such molecules are probably not toxins and may instead function in host manipulation, similar The P values were calculated using a onesided Fisher's exact test and represent the probability of observing the number of significantly induced genes for a specific category during a transition given the total number of significantly induced genes during that transition (log2 fold change >2, P < 0.05) and the total number of genes in the category. npg l e t t e r s to protein effectors 27 . Remarkably, the C. higginsianum secondary metabolism gene cluster with the strongest activation at this stage was silent in C. graminicola at all the infection stages we examined (Fig.…”
Section: E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already known avirulence genes and genes involved in host selective toxin production provide a basis to search genome-wide for candidate effectors according to the following features: genes encoding small secreted proteins (SSP) and clusters of genes involved in secondary metabolite (SM) production that show an increase in expression during plant infection [1,2]. Effectors are considered to be key elements of pathogenesis and symbiosis, by providing a mechanism for the fungus to circumvent host recognition, impede defense reactions and facilitate host invasion [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of HSTs and non-HSTs are low molecular weight SMs (Collemare & Lebrun, 2011) and different species of Dothideomycetes produce different profiles of SMs that are dispensable for growth. Based on their chemical structure, SMs are mostly classified as polyketides, nonribosomal peptides, alkaloids, terpenes, or metabolites of mixed biosynthetic origin (Collemare & Lebrun, 2011). SM non-HSTs and HSTs produced by fungi during infection of the host can be important determinants of pathogenicity or virulence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%