Funktionsverbgefüge - empirisch (am Beispiel von kommen)

Kamber, Alain

doi:10.13092/lo.28.614

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Eine grafische Darstellung des Verhältnisses von Funktionsverben mit anderen Gliedern des FVG bietet Kamber in seinem Modell der umrahmten Schnittmengen (Kamber 2006). Aus Kambers Schema der Schnittstellen von verschiedenen Typen der FVG ist es ersichtlich, dass die FVG, in welchen die Nominalphrase an das Funktionsverb einerseits und diejenigen, in welchen die Präpositionalphrasean das Funktionsverb verknüpft sind andererseitsals FVG im engeren Sinne bestimmt werden können.…”

Section: Einleitung: Fvg Als (Grenz)forschungsgegenstand Der Phraseol...unclassified

“…Dieses FVG ist in jedem der dreiuntersuchten Gesetzestexte belegt und kann deswegen als relativ häufiges FVG betrachtet werden. Die in der Gemeinsprache am häufigsten vorkommenden Funktionsverben sind bringen, führen, kommen, nehmen, setzen, stehen, stellen, sein (Kamber 2006).Der Vergleich der Rangfolge, der im Korpus der Verwaltungssprache vorkommenden FV, weist auf die interessante Tatsache hin, dass nur das Verb stellen sowohl in der Gemeinsprache als auch in der Verwaltungssprache vorkommt (Tabelle 1. ), während das Verb sein mit 12,46% unter den FVG der Gemeinsprache vertreten ist, und im Korpus der Verwaltungssprache mit nur 2,14%.…”

Section: Fvg In Der Verwaltungsspracheunclassified

“…Willkürlicher Gebrauch der Artikel (der unbestimmte Artikel anstatt des bestimmten oder Nullartikels): (Kamber 2006) und der Verwaltungssprache (Marušić 2009) in diesem Korpus nur als selbstständige Vollverben vorkommen: bleiben, geraten, ziehen, sich befinden, schließen, erhalten. Schwach vertreten sind noch folgende FV, die hier ihrer Häufigkeit nach gezählt werden: vorbringen (10), stehen (9 Belege), machen (9 Belege), anbringen (7), treten (7 Belege), finden (7 Belege), bringen, kommen, bestellen, entziehen (je 6 Belege), versetzen (4).…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Funktionsverbgefüge (Fvg) Als Merkmal Der Deutschen Rechtsund Verwaltungssprache

Kordić

Marušić

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Back in the 18thcentury, structures with phrasal verbs (FVG) were determined as a featureof German technical language. These constructs are still present in the language of law. Although the administrative language is considered a part of the legal language, there are discursive differences between specific(sub)languages in the field of law. One can speak of the discourses of justice, of criminal law, of international law, etc. It is the language of administrative law that citizens as lay people are most often confronted with, and it is often criticized as "a bureaucracy language", or "the paper style". The aim of this paper is to examine the structures with phrasal verbs frequently occurring in the language of German administrative law and compare them with those in German criminal procedure law. First partofthecorpusisbuiltbyphrasalverbstructuresexcerptedfromfollowing German laws: Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, Verwaltungsvollstreckungsgesetz, Verwaltungskostengesetz. In order to explore potential discursive differences between specific languages in the field of law, the collected examples are compared with the most frequent phrasal verb structures of the German criminal procedure law. For that purpose, the Criminal Procedure Code (StPO) of 1987 (last amended in 2015) is used as the second part of the researched corpus. In the concluding part of the paper, the authors draw conclusions based on the analysis carried out. The results of this study can be of assistance to law students in mastering German legal terminology, to all linguists dealing with German language of law and especially to all translators and interpreters from the German and into the German language.

show abstract

Section: Einleitung: Fvg Als (Grenz)forschungsgegenstand Der Phraseol...unclassified

Section: Fvg In Der Verwaltungsspracheunclassified

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Funktionsverbgefüge (Fvg) Als Merkmal Der Deutschen Rechtsund Verwaltungssprache

Kordić

Marušić

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions

Knop

2020

RCL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, foreign language pedagogy has recognized the need to focus (i) on larger meaningful sequences of words (Nattinger & DeCarrico, 1992; Wray, 2002; Ellis & Cadierno, 2009; Gonzalez Rey, 2013) and (ii) further on communicative goals (Nunan, 1991; Widdowson, 1992; Savignon, 2000). Difficulties in the learning process of a foreign language result from the conceptual and constructional differences between expressions in the native and foreign language. Teaching materials often propose a lexical approach with an unstructured set of constructed examples. With the postulate of meaningful schematic templates, Construction Grammar (CxG) has a number of assets for foreign language teaching (FLT) and learning (FLL), it allows among others to establish a structured inventory of abstract constructions with prototypical exemplars and inheritance links between the constructions’ instantiations. To be proficient in a foreign language also means to use new words in constructions. Learners can be asked to extend the use of new lexical units as slot-fillers into constructional patterns. This is exemplified with the use of German posture and placement verbs in the caused motion construction and the corresponding intransitive locative construction. But having learned a vast number of constructional templates of a language does not automatically imply that learners can produce L2-constructions and their instantiations in a creative way. Therefore, CxG must be enriched with further insights from Cognitive Linguistics which claims that conceptual categories and their linguistic expressions are the result of embodied processes (Lakoff, 1987). This chapter makes some suggestions for interactive activities which can foster ‘embodied teaching and learning’.

show abstract

Конструкции с опорным глаголом в русском и итальянском языках / Support Verb Constructions. A Russian-Italian Contrastive Analysis

Maiko

2022

Biblioteca Di Studi Slavistici

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The monograph focuses on a special type of collocations–Support, or Light, Verb Constructions (SVCs). SVCs consist of a semantically reduced verb together with a noun (as the direct object or embedded in a prepositional phrase) that conveys core lexical meaning to the combination. SVCs often vary cross-linguistically, with languages using different strategies to conceptualize the same denotative situations. This study in line with the principles of the Integrated Contrastive Model, aims firstly to offer a corpus-driven contrastive cognitive-semantic description of SVCs in Russian and Italian based on the Construction Grammar model; and secondly to conduct a Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis of the use of Russian SVCs by Italian-speaking students. The findings of this study, in addition to its theoretical significance, may be useful in teaching Russian as a foreign language and could be of interest for lexicography.

show abstract

Funktionsverbgefüge - empirisch (am Beispiel von kommen)

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Funktionsverbgefüge (Fvg) Als Merkmal Der Deutschen Rechtsund Verwaltungssprache

Funktionsverbgefüge (Fvg) Als Merkmal Der Deutschen Rechtsund Verwaltungssprache

The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions

Конструкции с опорным глаголом в русском и итальянском языках / Support Verb Constructions. A Russian-Italian Contrastive Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About