2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02912-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Furosemide stress test as a predictive marker of acute kidney injury progression or renal replacement therapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: The use of the furosemide stress test (FST) as an acute kidney injury (AKI) severity marker has been described in several trials. However, the diagnostic performance of the FST in predicting AKI progression has not yet been fully discussed. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to March 2020. The diagnostic performance of the FST (in terms of sensitivity, speci… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the methods for measuring most biomarkers are expensive and might not be suitable in daily practice. The furosemide stress test, a cheap and readily available functional test, has shown promise in AKI progression prediction [10][11][12]. Neutrophilto-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which can be readily measured in daily clinical practice, is calculated using the complete blood count.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the methods for measuring most biomarkers are expensive and might not be suitable in daily practice. The furosemide stress test, a cheap and readily available functional test, has shown promise in AKI progression prediction [10][11][12]. Neutrophilto-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which can be readily measured in daily clinical practice, is calculated using the complete blood count.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, predicting AKI progression is always one of research highlights. FST, a method for predicting AKI progression, had desirable prediction ability, which of AU-ROC was 0.88 [ 6 ]. Our model and previous FST studies have comparable prediction ability (AU-ROC 0.926 vs. 0.88).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, few methods were developed to predict AKI stage 1/2 to AKI stage 3. Furosemide stress test (FST) was considered as a robust predictive approach to identify who will progress to AKI stage 3 [ 6 ]. However, the clinical application has been hampered for several reasons such as lacking of high quality RCT [ 5 ], not stable for patients with unstable hemodynamics [ 7 ], no standardization of dosage and time [ 8 ] and ambiguous effect of other factors such as fluid balance and diuretic on the outcome [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furosemide stress test 15 , 16 was well studied to predict the progression of AKI and requirement for RRT. However, patients with frank hypovolemia may not tolerate intravenous furosemide and the efficacy was not well validated for patients with late chronic kidney disease, 16 whereas direct measurement of creatinine clearance theoretically do not pose these limitations. Furthermore, the furosemide stress test cannot be used for continuous monitoring due to its intrinsic limitation for repeated testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%