2014
DOI: 10.1186/bf03351684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further constraints for the Plio-Pleistocene geomagnetic field strength: New results from the Los Tuxtlas volcanic field (Mexico)

Abstract: A rock-magnetic, paleomagnetic and paleointensity study was carried out on 13 Plio-Pleistocene volcanic flows from the Los Tuxtlas volcanic field (Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt) in order to obtain some decisive constraints for the geomagnetic field strength during the Plio-Pleistocene time. The age of the volcanic units, which yielded reliable paleointensity estimates, lies between 2.2 and 0.8 Ma according to the available K/Ar radiometric data. Thermomagnetic investigations reveal that remanence is carried in m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution obtained (Fig. 2), to a significant degree, refines the previous data from [4,5,10] about the variations of the VDM in this interval.…”
Section: Materials Usedsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The distribution obtained (Fig. 2), to a significant degree, refines the previous data from [4,5,10] about the variations of the VDM in this interval.…”
Section: Materials Usedsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Alva-Valdivia et al (2001) presented paleointensity results for volcanic units in the Los Tuxtlas field, eastern Mexico. K-Ar dating indicates that units studied range from 2.2 Ma to Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squares denote to the mean value of several consecutive lava flows (this study, large symbols). For Plio‐Pleistocene time, however, some points represent the results from single cooling units [see Alva‐Valdivia et al , 2001]. …”
Section: Discussion and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While procedures for determining the direction of the paleomagnetic field are now more or less standardized, there still exist significant inter‐laboratory differences on how to best obtain reliable estimates of the paleomagnetic field intensity [ Valet and Herrero‐Bervera , 2000]. The Thellier and Thellier technique and all derived approaches, among which Coe et al 's [1978] modification received the largest audience in last years [ Juarez et al , 1998; Selkin and Tauxe , 2000; Alva‐Valdivia et al , 2001; Morales et al , 2001]. This technique was used in present study to determine absolute geomagnetic paleointensity.…”
Section: Paleointensity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%