2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.777181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further exploration of the object-image metric with image registration in mind

Abstract: An object-image metric is an extension of standard metrics in that it is constructed for matching and comparing configurations of object features to configurations of image features. For the generalized weak perspective camera, it is invariant to any affine transformation of the object or the image. Recent research in the exploitation of the object-image metric suggests new approaches to Automatic Target Recognition (ATR). This paper explores the object-image metric and its limitations. Through a series of exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional image registration algorithms, such as the algorithm of Davis and Keck [71,72], try to register the two images by computing the homography matrix H between corresponding feature points. The limit of this algorithm is that they assume all the points in the physical world are coplanar or approximately coplanar, which is not true with high-rise scenes.…”
Section: Image Registration With Depth Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The traditional image registration algorithms, such as the algorithm of Davis and Keck [71,72], try to register the two images by computing the homography matrix H between corresponding feature points. The limit of this algorithm is that they assume all the points in the physical world are coplanar or approximately coplanar, which is not true with high-rise scenes.…”
Section: Image Registration With Depth Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once we obtain the 3D structure of the feature points, the motion, and calibration of the camera, we can start to register the rest of the pixels in the images with the estimated depth information. The (a) The 1st frame in the 'oldhousing' video sequence (b) The 88th frame in the 'oldhousing' video sequence Figure 75: Original frames used for image registration traditional image registration algorithms, such as the algorithm proposed by Davis and Keck [71,72], try to register the two images by computing the homography matrix H between corresponding feature points. The limit of this algorithm is that they assume all the points in the physical world are coplanar or approximately coplanar, which is not true with high-rise scenes.…”
Section: Image Registration With Depth Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different techniques are compared for confidence, accuracy, timeliness, throughput, cost, and robustness. Image registration evaluation requires metrics [17], comparisons to image sets [18], and performance estimation and bounds [19]. Critical to IRM evaluation is a set of data for joint comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevailing image registration methods, such as the algorithm of Davis and Keck, 10,11 assume all the feature points are coplanar and build a homography transform matrix to do registration. The advantage is that they have low computational cost and can handle planar scenes conveniently; however, with the assumption that the scenes are approximately planar, they are inappropriate in the registration applications when the images have large depth variation due to the high-rise objects, known as the parallax problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%