2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further insight into the microstructure of compacted bentonite–sand mixture

Abstract: Compacted bricks of bentonite/sand mixture are planned to be used as sealing plugs in deep radioactive waste disposal repositories because of their low permeability, high swelling capacity and favourable properties with respect to radionuclide retention. The isolating capacity of compacted bentonite/sand mixture is closely related to microstructure features that have been often investigated, in particular by using scanning electron microscope (SEM or ESEM) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). In this work,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of mechanical paths are discussed firstly. Experimental data involving different pore size distributions of compacted bentonite–sand mixture samples at different dry densities and at the same water content are presented in Figure a . Bentonite–sand samples (70–30% proportion on dry mass basis) were compacted at a water content between 10% and 11% and at dry densities of 1.67 Mg/m 3 ( e 0 = 0.62), 1.80 Mg/m 3 ( e 0 = 0.5) and 1.97 Mg/m 3 ( e 0 = 0.37).…”
Section: The Role Of Pore Size Density Evolution In Modelling Water Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of mechanical paths are discussed firstly. Experimental data involving different pore size distributions of compacted bentonite–sand mixture samples at different dry densities and at the same water content are presented in Figure a . Bentonite–sand samples (70–30% proportion on dry mass basis) were compacted at a water content between 10% and 11% and at dry densities of 1.67 Mg/m 3 ( e 0 = 0.62), 1.80 Mg/m 3 ( e 0 = 0.5) and 1.97 Mg/m 3 ( e 0 = 0.37).…”
Section: The Role Of Pore Size Density Evolution In Modelling Water Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa técnica também é muito utilizada na determinação da curva de retenção e da condutividade hidráulica do solo. Entre os estudos realizados nessa área podem ser citados Delage e Lefebvre (1984), Prapaharan et al (1985), Juang e Holtz (1986), Griffiths e Joshi (1989), Delage et al (1996), Romero (1999), Penumadu e Dean (1999), Simms e Yanful (2001), Buenfil (2007), Romero e Simms (2008), Mascarenha (2008), Koliji et al (2010), Sivakumar et al (2010), Alonso et al (2011), Romero (2013, Otalvaro (2013), Borges (2014), Ferrari et al (2014), Ghirian e Fall (2014), Mountassir et al (2014), Saba et al (2014), Wen e Yan (2014), Borges (2014 Sucção (kPa) Silva (2007), natural Silva (2009) Após a compactação os corpos de prova para a execução dos ensaios foram moldados (Figura 3.9).…”
Section: Modelagem Da Curva De Retençãounclassified
“…Note that such a relationship, relating the microstructural void ratio to the total water content (not the microstructural water content), is justified by the fact that, in compacted bentonites, the capillary water represents only a small fraction of the total water stored. The parameters of the model for the compacted mixture were calibrated based on experimental pore size distributions presented in [21,22]: e m0 = 0.29, β 0 = 0.1 and β 1 = 0.18. The model is validated against experimental data on wetting paths under unconfined conditions.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%