2007
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further K-Ar dating and paleomagnetic study of the Auckland geomagnetic excursions

Abstract: Three different excursional paleomagnetic directions were reported from eight volcanoes of the Auckland volcanic field in New Zealand: north-down (ND) directions obtained from five volcanoes, west-up (WU) from two volcanoes, and south-up (SU) from one volcano. K-Ar ages have been reported for two of these volcanoes: 27±5 (1σ ) ka for the Wiri volcano of the ND group and 55±5 ka for the Hampton Park volcano of the WU group. In the present study, we have carried out further K-Ar age determinations on three other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(48 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of records that exhibit the Mono Lake excursion is smaller than for the Laschamp excursion records: when combined with the wide range of ages for the Mono Lake excursion, this contributes to a smooth signal over the time period. However, we do note that the Mono Lake is recorded in lavas from New Zealand (Cassata et al, 2008;Cassidy & Hill, 2009;Mochizuki et al, 2004Mochizuki et al, , 2007 with ages in the range from 30 to 35 ka. Other excursions reported over the 0-100 ka period are Hilina Pali (17 ka) (Coe et al, 1978;Singer et al, 2014), Norwegian-Greenland Sea excursion (60 ka) (Laj & Channell, 2015;Nowaczyk et al, 1994), and Sk alamaelifell or post-Blake excursion (100 ka) (Jicha et al, 2011;Singer, 2014).…”
Section: 1029/2017gc007271mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The number of records that exhibit the Mono Lake excursion is smaller than for the Laschamp excursion records: when combined with the wide range of ages for the Mono Lake excursion, this contributes to a smooth signal over the time period. However, we do note that the Mono Lake is recorded in lavas from New Zealand (Cassata et al, 2008;Cassidy & Hill, 2009;Mochizuki et al, 2004Mochizuki et al, , 2007 with ages in the range from 30 to 35 ka. Other excursions reported over the 0-100 ka period are Hilina Pali (17 ka) (Coe et al, 1978;Singer et al, 2014), Norwegian-Greenland Sea excursion (60 ka) (Laj & Channell, 2015;Nowaczyk et al, 1994), and Sk alamaelifell or post-Blake excursion (100 ka) (Jicha et al, 2011;Singer, 2014).…”
Section: 1029/2017gc007271mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Given the difficulty with excess Ar highlighted in the McDougall et al (1969) study that produced these results, we do not think this represents a reliable age for this centre. Mochizuki et al (2007). We consider these most recent analyses the most reliable for this centre, and the ArÁAr age is more precise ( (Table 4).…”
Section: Otuatauamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cassata et al (2008) carried out ArÁAr experiments on this centre; their weighted mean isochron age of multiple analyses (26.698 ka) provided an age younger than the KÁAr age (5595 ka) of Mochizuki et al (2007); however, the analyses were problematic and did not yield a reliable weighted mean plateau age. Based on discussions by Cassata et al (2008), neither the ArÁAr nor KÁAr ages determined so far should be relied upon.…”
Section: Hampton Parkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mono Lake RPI low is recorded at ∼34.7 ka according to the correlation of the sedimentary paleoclimatic proxies with oxygen isotopes records from Greenland (GICC05 age model) [ NGRIP Dating Group 2006, and references therein]. Volcanic records of the Mono Lake excursion were also retrieved from New Zealand [ Shibuya et al , 1992; Mochizuki et al , 2004, 2006, 2007; Cassata et al , 2008; Cassidy and Hill , 2009], Hawaii [ Laj et al , 2002; Teanby et al , 2002] and the Canary Islands [ Kissel et al , 2011]. The case of the Mono Lake excursion, therefore, remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%