1995
DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01788-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further validation of a quadruplex STR DNA typing system: a collaborative effort to identify victims of a mass disaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA profiling based on STRs is the most popular method of human identification due to the highly polymorphic nature of STRs and the ease of their genotyping (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). In comparison to minisatellites, the small amplified fragment length of STRs facilitates its utility in the analysis of degraded DNA samples (6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA profiling based on STRs is the most popular method of human identification due to the highly polymorphic nature of STRs and the ease of their genotyping (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). In comparison to minisatellites, the small amplified fragment length of STRs facilitates its utility in the analysis of degraded DNA samples (6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the results are consistent with those reported in other studies where DNA profiling was performed using different tissues of decomposed human bodies. These study involved DNA amplification of STR loci from a relative amount of DNA present in the heart, liver, femoral muscles and thigh muscles, respectively (Bar et al 1988;Clayton et al 1995;Takahashia et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first DVI projects to employ DNA typing technology followed the 1993 Waco siege, culminating in the outbreak of a fire on April 19, 1993, which resulted in the death of more than 70 people (3)(4)(5). The identification of individuals following this particular incident presented many challenges to investigators.…”
Section: The History Of Dna DVImentioning
confidence: 99%