2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further validation of the chronic pain coping inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Descriptively, although all age groups reported pain contingent "resting" about 3 days per week, younger adults reported using this strategy with a slightly greater relative frequency as compared to older adults. This strategy is widely considered to be maladaptive, as it has been associated with depression, pain interference, disability, and pain intensity (Tan et al, 2005) and is specifically targeted by a number of operant and cognitive-behavioral pain management approaches (Fordyce, 1976;Novy, 2004). Although older adults also employed this strategy, its lower ranking suggests that, perhaps as a result of aging or experience, older adults have learned that resting is not as effective for managing chronic pain as are other strategies (e.g., pacing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Descriptively, although all age groups reported pain contingent "resting" about 3 days per week, younger adults reported using this strategy with a slightly greater relative frequency as compared to older adults. This strategy is widely considered to be maladaptive, as it has been associated with depression, pain interference, disability, and pain intensity (Tan et al, 2005) and is specifically targeted by a number of operant and cognitive-behavioral pain management approaches (Fordyce, 1976;Novy, 2004). Although older adults also employed this strategy, its lower ranking suggests that, perhaps as a result of aging or experience, older adults have learned that resting is not as effective for managing chronic pain as are other strategies (e.g., pacing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants are asked to indicate how many days in the past week they used each strategy at least once to cope with pain. Internal consistency and temporal stability of this measure are quite strong (mean Cronbach's α = .84, test-retest r = .80; Jensen et al, 1995), and predictive validity of the CPCI subscales has been demonstrated through associations with relevant outcomes such as pain interference, depression, disability, and pain severity (Hadjistavropoulos et al, 1999;Jensen et al, 1995;Tan et al, 2005).The version used in the present study included the original 64-item, eight-subscale CPCI as well as a new 6-item subscale assessing the use of activity pacing, such as taking breaks, going slower, and separating large tasks into more manageable components (i.e., "Pacing"). This Pacing subscale has demonstrated adequate validity and reliability in older adults living with chronic pain (Cronbach's α = .79; Ersek, Turner, & Kemp, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participating subjects provided informed consent. Data from these surveys have been reported in previous articles, [43][44][45][46] but the focus of this article differs from those previously published studies. The survey packets included 2 measures of coping, a measure of pain-related beliefs, and several measures of pain and functioning.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 65-item CPCI assesses eight coping strategies often targeted for change in pain management programs (Guarding, Resting, Asking for Assistance, Relaxation, Task Persistence, Exercise/Stretch, Seek Support, and Coping Self-Statements; Jensen et al, 1995) and has demonstrated reliability and validity in numerous samples of patients with chronic pain Hadjistavropoulos et al, 1999;Tan et al, 2001Tan et al, ,2005.…”
Section: Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%