2007
DOI: 10.1080/10640260601044493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Validation of the Self-Loathing Subscale as a Screening Tool for Eating Disorders

Abstract: This study examines the reliability and validity of the Self Loathing Subscale (SLSS) of the Exercise Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) as a screening tool for possible eating disorders. We administered the SLSS and two other eating disorder screening instruments to 160 college students. Results indicate that the SLSS shows high internal consistency, concurrent validity, and convergent validity. Since the SLSS is based on questions about exercise and is not easily identifiable as a screening tool for eating diso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other tools attempt to address specific screening problems that concern the ED population, such as lack of disclosure. The Self-Loathing Subscale (SLSS) has been shown to have high internal consistency, concurrent validity, and convergent validity; since the SLSS is based on questions about exercise and is not easily identifiable as a screening tool for EDs, the scale may be particularly useful in identifying possible pathologies in individuals who may try to suppress or deny obvious symptoms of EDs (Aruguete et al, 2007). Alternatively, clinicians should recognize that the majority of women with EDs will not readily disclose this information to their healthcare providers, so asking questions sensitively as a concerned provider for the infant or child might be better received than strategies Engaging Healthcare Providers to Help Mothers with Eating Disorders Create Healthy Eating Environments for Their Children such as use of the SLSS (Carwell and Spatz, 2011).…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other tools attempt to address specific screening problems that concern the ED population, such as lack of disclosure. The Self-Loathing Subscale (SLSS) has been shown to have high internal consistency, concurrent validity, and convergent validity; since the SLSS is based on questions about exercise and is not easily identifiable as a screening tool for EDs, the scale may be particularly useful in identifying possible pathologies in individuals who may try to suppress or deny obvious symptoms of EDs (Aruguete et al, 2007). Alternatively, clinicians should recognize that the majority of women with EDs will not readily disclose this information to their healthcare providers, so asking questions sensitively as a concerned provider for the infant or child might be better received than strategies Engaging Healthcare Providers to Help Mothers with Eating Disorders Create Healthy Eating Environments for Their Children such as use of the SLSS (Carwell and Spatz, 2011).…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Draeger et al (23) studied the concept of obligatory exercise by assessing an overcommitment to exercise using the Self-Loathing Subscale (SLSS). Aruguete et al (24) verified the reliability and validity of the SLSS as a tool for possible EDs. These studies suggest that the SLSS has high internal consistency, concurrent validity, and convergent validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These studies suggest that the SLSS has high internal consistency, concurrent validity, and convergent validity. Aruguete et al (24) also mentioned that the SLSS as a part of the EOQ was based on exercise-related issues; therefore, it was not easily identifiable by participants as a screening tool for eating disorders. Hausenblas and Downs (25) noted that overstating the similarities between eating disorders and obligatory exercisers and using unidimensional scales to assess the complete construct was not appropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%