“…It can effectively reduce manufacturing costs compared to other 3D printing techniques. In comparison, inkjet printing and aerosol jet printing require ultrafine powders (submicrometer size) and low solid contents to prepare printable low-viscosity inks, leading to an increased cost; digital light processing–stereolithography needs expensive and special photosensitive resin in the slurry as well as lengthy debinding (hours to days). − Furthermore, during the conventional methods (extrusion, dip coating, and phase inversion) and fused filament fabrication, a high amount of binder (e.g., mass ratios of binder/ceramics are 10–25 wt %) is usually required, which may cause severe deformation issues during the postdrying/sintering processes. ,,,, In our case, the binder content (e.g., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose) in the paste is only 0.31 wt %, ensuring the feasible viscosity for printing and mitigating the deformation issues. Moreover, to further achieve good shape retainability of the anode and ensure good adhesion between printed layers without requiring high paste viscosity, a CO 2 laser was used for rapid in situ drying of the printed green body after printing each layer of the anode support.…”