Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2522848.2532589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusing multi-modal features for gesture recognition

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel multi-modal gesture recognition framework and introduces its application to continuous sign language recognition. A Hidden Markov Model is used to construct the audio feature classifier. A skeleton feature classifier is trained to provided complementary information based on the Dynamic Time Warping model. The confidence scores generated by two classifiers are firstly normalized and then combined to produce a weighted sum for the final recognition. Experimental results have shown tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…And our model achieves better recognition rate than the winner of the challenge [29] that uses variant of nearest neighbour and dynamic time warping in the ChaLearn Gesture dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…And our model achieves better recognition rate than the winner of the challenge [29] that uses variant of nearest neighbour and dynamic time warping in the ChaLearn Gesture dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We follow the experimental protocol adopted in [3,14,22,25] and provide precision, recall and F1-score measures on the validation set. We compare our model with Yao et al [25], Wu et al [22], Pfister et al [14], and Fernando et al [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision Recall F-score Pfister et al [17] 61.2% 62.3% 61.7% Yao et al [28] --56.0% Wu et al [26] 59.9% 59.3% 59.6% VideoDarwin [5] 74.0% 73.8% 73.9% HiVideoDarwin 74.9% 75.6% 74.6% Table 3. Statistical analysis for parameters.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%