2014
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.03741-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion Activation through Attachment Protein Stalk Domains Indicates a Conserved Core Mechanism of Paramyxovirus Entry into Cells

Abstract: Paramyxoviruses are a large family of membrane-enveloped negative-stranded RNA viruses causing important diseases in humans and animals. Two viral integral membrane glycoproteins (fusion [F] and attachment [HN, H, or G]) mediate a concerted process of host receptor recognition, followed by the fusion of viral and cellular membranes, resulting in viral nucleocapsid entry into the cytoplasm. However, the sequence of events that closely links the timing of receptor recognition by HN, H, or G and the "triggering" … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(143 reference statements)
4
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This F-triggering function of the attachment protein can be dissociated from its other functions, such as intracellular transport, association with F and receptor binding, which indicates that it resides in a distinct region. Indeed, the attachment protein stalk domain is still able to trigger the F protein even when the globular head is removed (Bose et al, 2012(Bose et al, , 2014Brindley et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This F-triggering function of the attachment protein can be dissociated from its other functions, such as intracellular transport, association with F and receptor binding, which indicates that it resides in a distinct region. Indeed, the attachment protein stalk domain is still able to trigger the F protein even when the globular head is removed (Bose et al, 2012(Bose et al, , 2014Brindley et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7C and D). Interestingly, we recently showed that these residues could tolerate a variety of mutations while maintaining the ability to trigger F but that directly adjacent hydrophobic residues V81 and L85, critical for triggering PIV5 F, were much less tolerant of substitution (63). This may partially explain why A82 and Q86 were identified when we were selecting for viable sAb resistance mutations.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This movement exposes critical residues in the stalk domain that interact with and trigger F to initiate membrane fusion (41,62,63). This model is based on the following observations: (i) mutations in HN that affect only fusion activity map to the stalk region of the attachment protein of several paramyxoviruses (12,18,42,43,64,65); (ii) headless PIV5 and NDV HN, MeV H, and NiV G are sufficient to trigger fusion (41,63,66,67); (iii) the head domains of HN have been observed by EM to be in various orientations relative to the stalk for NDV (12) and PIV5 (41); (iv) a crystal structure of the tetrameric NDV HN ectodomain reveals the heads in the down position, forming an interface with the stalk that overlaps with the critical fusion (69) was used to morph high-resolution structures of HN, F, and the humanized anti-HER2 Fab, 4D5 (which the sAb phage library was based on), to 15-Å surface representations. Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries 3T1E and 3TSI were overlaid and used for the HN four-heads-down model.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pCAGGS-F and pCAGGS-HN expression constructs harboring the PIV5 W3A F and HN or NDV F and HN (strain Australia-Victoria) genes were used as described previously (19,50). Mutations in pCAGGS-F were constructed by four-primer PCR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Together with biochemical and structural data of paramyxovirus attachment proteins (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28), a general model of paramyxovirus fusion has been proposed: upon activation by the attachment protein, metastable prefusion F undergoes a series of large-scale, ATP-independent conformational changes, going down an energy gradient from a metastable prefusion state to a highly stable postfusion state. The energy released during F refolding is believed to facilitate membrane fusion to create a pore between the virus and host cell through which the viral ribonucleoprotein complex can enter the target cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%