Higher trainees in child and adolescent psychiatry and their consultant trainers reported high levels of com pliance with existing JCHPT guidelines on the structure of direct supervision. There was a consensus about the ideal content of supervision sessions but disparity about whether this is achieved in practice and over issues of responsibility for raising certain topic areas. These find ings are discussed and some questions to be addressed by trainee and trainer at the outset of the supervision process are suggested.The direct supervision of higher trainees by their consultant trainers, involving face to face dis cussion, is often seen as a cornerstone of pro fessional development in child and adolescent psychiatry and is undoubtedly a strong formative influence on attitudes concerning the specialty and its practice. Many practitioners will have experienced in their own training great variation in the style and content of supervision and reflected on the impact of this. While some ex periences of supervision may be inspiring, others may serve only to demoralise. The extent to which it is possible and desirable to set stan dards, monitor guidelines and provide training for the supervision process is uncertain.In the United Kingdom the Joint Committee on Higher Psychiatric Training IJCHFT1, published a handbook [19901 which describes require ments and standards about specialty training. A system of regular inspection of training schemes identifies the extent to which these are met. Bools Si Cottrell (1990) presented results of a survey of higher trainees in child and adolescent psychiatry which suggested that changes in training and in trainees' attitudes when com pared to an earlier survey in 1979 [Garralda et al, 1983] had broadly followed JCHPT guidelines. The committee can therefore be seen to function as an important link in an interactive process of training and educational development.The JCHPT handbook gives firm guidelines about the frequency and regularity of direct con sultant supervision. Even so Bools & Cottrell (1990) were concerned that 27% of respondents were receiving less than one hour of direct con sultant supervision per week and that nearly 10% reported receiving no individual supervision at all. The guidelines recognise that the practice of supervision varies widely and leave room for flexibility to meet the individual needs of trainees at different stages of training. While this ap proach permits adaptation and creativity within the supervision process, it also allows for misunderstandings arising from disparities of perceived requirement, expectation and beliefs about the nature of the task. The content of sessions, permission and responsibility to raise certain issues, and the nature of the super visory relationship may form the subject of the difficulties.We present the results of a survey of the perceptions of consultant trainers and higher trainees in child and adolescent psychiatry in England and Wales concerning their practical experience of the direct supervision process in wh...