Future directions in disaster governance: Insights from the 2018 Central Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami response

Trias, Angelo Paolo L.; Cook, Alistair David Blair

doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102180

Cited by 25 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, foreign actors generally view ASEAN 2.0 as a complex challenge because it adds another layer of bureaucracy. For multilateral institutions such as the United Nations, the AHA Centre becomes a challenge because the United Nations has a dynamic nature, adaptive capacity, and flexibility (Trias and Cook 2019). For the AHA Centre, the Central Sulawesi disaster provided a platform to test ASEAN 2.0 capabilities and the interoperability agreement with the United Nations (AHA Centre 2018).…”

Section: Case Study Of Disasters In Indonesia 2010-2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Continued progress leads to a growing preference for nationally led emergency response models, supported regionally and internationally as necessary. National actors affiliated with the government and others had minimal problems mobilizing their personnel and material resources in the disaster-affected areas during the Central Sulawesi disaster (Trias and Cook 2019).…”

Section: Case Study Of Disasters In Indonesia 2010-2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, external support from regional partners and/or the international humanitarian system for disaster response occurs only with the consent of the affected country, usually upon request or upon acceptance of offers of assistance (OCHA 2018a). Foreign actors are allowed to operate or demonstrate that they have specific capabilities that fill gaps or sufficient capacity to deliver at scale and complement the efforts led by the Indonesian government (Trias and Cook 2019). Indonesia did not receive foreign aid when the disaster occurred in Central Sulawesi.…”

Section: Case Study Of Disasters In Indonesia 2010-2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

ASEAN Mechanism in Disaster Management: A Case Study of Disaster Management in Indonesia 2010-2020

Sari

2022

JGS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The geographical location of the Southeast Asia region, which is between an intercontinental fault, two oceans, and the Pacifc Ring of Fire, has implications for the probability of the region’s vulnerability to natural disasters. Therefore, how Southeast Asian countries deal with this problem becomes an interesting subject of study. The awareness among Southeast Asian countries of the necessity for collective eﬀorts in disaster mitigation and disaster management is closely related to the ASEAN Way mechanism. This paper discusses environmental security by looking at the ASEAN mechanism in disaster management and the case studies of disasters that occurred in Indonesia. Employing the concept of cohesion, the signing of the AADMER and the establishment of the AHA Centre became a positive signal of group cohesion. This study fnds that there is a contradiction between the ASEAN Way and the disaster management mechanism among ASEAN member states in their application. Still, on the one hand, it strengthens the cohesion of ASEAN member states. The ASEAN Way prohibits any intervention from member states against aﬀected states except at the states’ request with the urgency of collective disaster management. However, cohesion among member states is determined by the behavior of each state, considering the complexity of the inﬂuencing factors. Letak geografs kawasan Asia Tenggara yang berada di antara patahan-antarbenua, dua samudera serta bentangan Cincin Api Pasifk memiliki implikasi terhadap probabilitas kerentanan kawasan tersebut dalam menghadapi bencana alam. Kesadaran negara-negara Asia Tenggara tentang perlunya upaya kolektif dalam melakukan mitigasi bencana dan manajemen bencana berkaitan erat dengan mekanisme ASEAN Way. Tulisan ini membahas mengenai keamanan lingkungan yang dikaji dengan melihat mekanisme ASEAN dalam penanggulangan bencana dengan studi kasus bencana yang terjadi di Indonesia. Menggunakan konsep kohesi, penandatanganan AADMER dan pembentukan AHA Centre menjadi sinyal positif pembentukan kohesi kelompok. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa antara ASEAN Way dengan mekanisme penanganan bencana antar negara anggota ASEAN terlihat bertolak belakang dengan aplikasinya, namun di satu sisi semakin memperkuat kohesi anggota ASEAN. ASEAN Way melarang adanya campur tangan negara anggota terhadap negara terdampak kecuali atas permintaan negara tersebut dengan urgensi penanganan bencana secara kolektif. Meskipun demikian, kohesi di antara para negara anggota ditentukan pula oleh perilaku masing-masing negara, mengingat faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya pun cukup kompleks

show abstract

Section: Case Study Of Disasters In Indonesia 2010-2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Case Study Of Disasters In Indonesia 2010-2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Case Study Of Disasters In Indonesia 2010-2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

ASEAN Mechanism in Disaster Management: A Case Study of Disaster Management in Indonesia 2010-2020

Sari

2022

JGS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…17 of 2010 [9] it is stated that post-disaster recovery activities consist of two main activities, namely rehabilitation and reconstruction. Furthermore, the substantial targets of rehabilitation and reconstruction include six targets, namely the humanitarian aspect, the housing and settlement aspect, the development infrastructure aspect, the economic aspect, the social aspect, and the cross-sectoral aspect [10] and [11].…”

Section: Post-disaster Recovery and Rehabilitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Economic Analysis of Disaster Recovery Index Sigi District CT

Tope¹,

Ichwan²,

Jokolelono³

et al. 2022

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The natural disaster that occurred in Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi Province on September 28, 2018 has resulted in the disruption of people's lives as well as damage to educational, health and economic facilities. This requires an attempt to restore to normal. Recovery is a series of activities to restore the condition of the community affected by the disaster by re-functioning the infrastructure and facilities in the fields of education, health and the economy by carrying out rehabilitation. To measure the level of recovery after rehabilitation and reconstruction, a general measure in the form of an index number is needed, namely Ina-PDRI. The results showed that until now the post-disaster recovery index in Sigi Regency is 74.87 percent. This shows that the socio-economic conditions in Sigi Regency are still better before the natural disaster by 25.13 percent compared to the current situation. This value is the weighted average of the disaster recovery index in the Education sector which only reached 63.17 percent, the disaster recovery index in the Health sector only reached 66.81 percent. Meanwhile, the disaster recovery index in the economic

show abstract

“…ASEAN Emergency Response and Assessment Teams (ASEAN-ERAT) assisted the Indonesian National Disaster Management Authority (BNPB) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in setting up the Joint Operations and Coordination Center for International Assistance (JOCCIA), which helped Indonesia manage incoming offers of international assistance (AHA Centre, 2018). This was the first time that a regional body was assigned to coordinate offers of non-governmental and international assistance during a disaster response, and the consensus was that the AHA Centre and ASEAN 2.0 had proven themselves to be operational (Trias & Cook, 2019). All of these contribute significantly towards realising the AHA Centre's goal of becoming the central coordinating agency for disaster management and emergency response in the region, and is a clear indication that it is making headway in terms of improving its operational and coordination capacity…”

Section: Asean Coordinating Centre For Humanitarian Assistance On Dis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Disaster governance and prospects of inter-regional partnership in the Asia-Pacific

Cook

Chen

2020

The Pacific Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Southwest Pacific is considered one of the most vulnerable regions in the world to natural hazards. Five of the Pacific Island States (PIS) rank among the top 20 most-at risk countries in the World Risk Index, with Vanuatu and Tonga ranking first and second respectively. The Southwest Pacific neighbours Southeast Asia and both regions are exposed to a variety of natural hazards, resulting in significant damage and loss of lives annually. Similar exposure to climate-induced hazards raises the potential to create a coalition of affected states from the Asia-Pacific to share knowledge of disaster governance in areas where niche capabilities have been developed and shape the global debate on the effects of natural hazards and climateinduced disasters. This article argues that inter-regional partnership on disaster governance is the next step in the Asia-Pacific to respond to a collective action problem affecting two subregions -Southeast Asia and the Southwest Pacific. Through the conduct of desk research and interviews, this article first presents findings and observations on the disaster governance landscape and future developments in the Pacific. It then discusses disaster management frameworks and initiatives that ASEAN has institutionalised, and how work in the two subregions can complement one another and provide a platform to help shape the global agenda on disaster governance and climate change.

show abstract

Future directions in disaster governance: Insights from the 2018 Central Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami response

Cited by 25 publications

References 43 publications

ASEAN Mechanism in Disaster Management: A Case Study of Disaster Management in Indonesia 2010-2020

ASEAN Mechanism in Disaster Management: A Case Study of Disaster Management in Indonesia 2010-2020

Social Economic Analysis of Disaster Recovery Index Sigi District CT

Disaster governance and prospects of inter-regional partnership in the Asia-Pacific

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About