2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future implementation of mobility as a service (MaaS): Results of an international Delphi study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
59
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results pointed out by study trees #1 and #2 displayed a general 69% adherence rate from both car users and non-car users towards MaaS. Considering that the average age of our sample was between 22 and 25 years old, we can infer that MaaS use in a developing country does have a positive acceptance from Millennials, corroborating with Jittrapirom et al [18]. Furthermore, we also found that, when we analyzed isolated characteristics such as: app payment, transport integration, monthly plan, and customization, our results presented a positive probability of substitution for both car users and non-car users.…”
Section: Predisposition Towardssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results pointed out by study trees #1 and #2 displayed a general 69% adherence rate from both car users and non-car users towards MaaS. Considering that the average age of our sample was between 22 and 25 years old, we can infer that MaaS use in a developing country does have a positive acceptance from Millennials, corroborating with Jittrapirom et al [18]. Furthermore, we also found that, when we analyzed isolated characteristics such as: app payment, transport integration, monthly plan, and customization, our results presented a positive probability of substitution for both car users and non-car users.…”
Section: Predisposition Towardssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Even an industry as solid and consolidated as the automotive one, could suffer from a change of habits of a generation, as can be seen historically by the example of several consolidated industries that were disrupted by digitalization: Kodak vs. digital cameras; Blockbuster vs. Netflix; encyclopedia Britannica vs. Wikipedia; hotels vs. Airbnb, and so on [30]. With an expectation that MaaS will be adopted first by younger generations, it has the potential to disrupt the mobility industry on the same level as the aforementioned new business platform entrants disrupted traditional business models [18], [31].…”
Section: Consumer and Travel Behavior Within Urban Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are just a few more radical and alternative voices, involving ideas like shared and multi-modal forms of mobility where livability and sustainability goals are prioritized. Additionally, academic literature mentions these other innovations that concern the integration of multiple modes by providing real-time information, such as multi-modal travel planners, and sometimes also including the booking and payment of such modes [3,8,13,27,31]. These also include several new mobility services, such as ride sharing, ride hailing, forms of car sharing, bike sharing, and the integration of such forms, linking to the more traditional forms of public transport.…”
Section: Smart Mobility: Incremental Innovations and Short-term Fixesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the Dutch case, little evidence is found that smart mobility is brought into relation with a possible larger transformation of the mobility system and the smart mobility developments remain largely associated with an innovative and experimental stage. When aiming for system change, such developments still need to mature and scale-up [3,4,[6][7][8]27,28,31], meaning that along with new technological options, it requires the co-evolution of the industry, infrastructures, business models, legislations, user behavior and preferences, and cultural norms and values [32]. It requires, for example, an infrastructural basis of a high-quality road network [3,7], and a physical high-quality ICT network [3,28]; it furthermore requires users' acceptance and willingness to adapt their behavior [3,4,7], and it asks for collaborative alignments and new forms of governance, involving multiple stakeholders and their diverse set of needs and interests [3,6,8,27].…”
Section: Smart Mobility: Incremental Innovations and Short-term Fixesmentioning
confidence: 99%