“…This includes the calculated risk of being exposed to hazards as well as affective feelings associated with potential hazards, such as threats from other people (e.g., terrorism, violence, theft, harassments or infections), impacts of accidents (e.g., vehicle accidents, safe waiting areas), discomfort (e.g., a smooth ride quality), and/or fear (e.g., not knowing how to travel, accident, threat). Beecroft and Pangbourne [2] conclude that freedom from potential hazards is equal to high personal security. Service Quality has been highly researched in the past (see, e.g., [3] for an overview), and generally includes different aspects of the travel environment and travel mode(s), such as information, staff behavior, reliability, and comfort.…”