2016
DOI: 10.1108/fs-10-2014-0063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Futures of science with and for society: towards transformative policy orientations

Abstract: Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:393177 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although recent literature has extended far beyond the classical "technology-push" model of innovation [46] and advanced our view on the innovation process through more flexible innovation models such as agile gate stage [22], lean start up [47], design thinking [24], project management [25], open innovation [48], and other techniques, it does not seem to be reflected upon in RRI literatures. On the other side, RRI and CSR studies tend to describe other techniques, sometimes overlapping with major innovation management practices, such as walkshop approach [49], engagement workshops [50][51][52], online platforms [53]; online knowledge sharing [54,55], social experimentation and design thinking [56,57], anticipation of risks and technology assessment [58,59].…”
Section: The 3w1h Of Stakeholder Involvement-exploring the Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent literature has extended far beyond the classical "technology-push" model of innovation [46] and advanced our view on the innovation process through more flexible innovation models such as agile gate stage [22], lean start up [47], design thinking [24], project management [25], open innovation [48], and other techniques, it does not seem to be reflected upon in RRI literatures. On the other side, RRI and CSR studies tend to describe other techniques, sometimes overlapping with major innovation management practices, such as walkshop approach [49], engagement workshops [50][51][52], online platforms [53]; online knowledge sharing [54,55], social experimentation and design thinking [56,57], anticipation of risks and technology assessment [58,59].…”
Section: The 3w1h Of Stakeholder Involvement-exploring the Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sustainability and care [14]. Combining these dimensions can become "a transformative ingredient of 'responsibilisation' of actors and institutions in R&I systems" [15]. Whilst RRI's shift from academic discussion to institutional practice is well underway, a good part of these practices focusses on opening up research and innovation [16].…”
Section: Theory and Practice Of Open Agenda Setting (A Short History Of Pase)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"In combination with anticipation and reflection, responsiveness can become a transformative ingredient of 'responsibilisation' of actors and institutions in R&I systems" [15]. Here, Pagliarino et al [84] describe how agronomic techniques in organic farming have been improved, yields stabilised and increased, and actual discoveries made, for example the allelopathic function of certain species used as cover crop.…”
Section: Benefits Of Pasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foresight studies suggest (e.g. van Oost et al 2016) that next generation science policies will not necessarily remain a responsibility mainly of governments but will become an integral part of the functioning of knowledge and innovation systems -which will be transformed themselves, including new sponsors and new performing actors. Future science policy designs can build on 'creative corporatism' (Ornston 2013), a concept in which governments (and/or related international alliances) will adopt the crucial role of facilitating broader, more diverse 'varieties of cooperation' in advanced capitalist economies.…”
Section: Science Policy Coping With System Transformation and Uncertamentioning
confidence: 99%