2018
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2018.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy participatory planning processes as arenas for collaborative learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this was a joint outcome, signifying new congruent frames, there were no rules highlighting obligations and expectations from the actors involved. This is similar to what some academics have described as fuzzy governance [58], which can have the potential for collaborative learning [59].…”
Section: Second In-between Spacesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this was a joint outcome, signifying new congruent frames, there were no rules highlighting obligations and expectations from the actors involved. This is similar to what some academics have described as fuzzy governance [58], which can have the potential for collaborative learning [59].…”
Section: Second In-between Spacesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast, the boundaries of the second in-between space were fuzzier [59]. This meant that citizen stakeholders were able to interact and develop a relationship with the municipal project team.…”
Section: Collaboration Within In-between Spaces Created In Participat...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The strategic planning of hybrid activities not only facilitated introductions and relationship building but also created a platform for knowledge exchange and offered participants opportunities to familiarise themselves with the transdisciplinary approach. As documented in recent studies [46][47][48], the establishment of 'communication spaces' having fuzzy boundaries, albeit structured interactions, supports the sharing of valuable insights and experiences, leading to collective learning and growth. Investing in well-designed interactions can be seen to have strengthened the community's foundation, unlocking more of its potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reimagining space governance will involve expanding the current range of stakeholders and must include the broader community in particular, especially given the cultural, health and well-being issues inherently involved in living and working in space. There are extensive, and likely reciprocal, lessons from participatory planning and community engagement for the functional and flourishing aspects of governance: for example, in terms of the possibilities related to grassroot and remote engagement technologies, contested public arenas, decision-making and participatory ethics in highly-regulated regimes (Adams, 2013, Legacy et al , 2014, Devisch et al , 2018) and from international perspectives that question our prevailing “urbanisms”, “worlding practices” and planning theories (Roy, 2011).…”
Section: Moving Forward Through Multidisciplinary Agendasmentioning
confidence: 99%