2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3010878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Reliability Assessment of Safety Instrumented Systems Accounting for Common Cause Failure

Abstract: Reliability of safety instrumented systems (SISs) is a critical measure to ensure production safety of many industries. This paper focus on low-demand SISs. The reliability of these SISs is quantified by evaluating their probability of failure on demand (PFD). However, due to lack of knowledge, and/or vague judgments from experts, epistemic uncertainty associated with the parameters of components' degradation models is inevitable. Meanwhile, common cause failure (CCF) of two or more components caused by shared… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, one of our future works is to assess the system reliability-box by fusing the multiple sources of information/knowledge under the evidential variable framework. Furthermore, the studied system in our work is binary-state, our future work is to extend the proposed method under the multi-state systems [33], [34], [35]. The curse of dimension of the number of focal elements should be carefully treated in the context of multistate systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, one of our future works is to assess the system reliability-box by fusing the multiple sources of information/knowledge under the evidential variable framework. Furthermore, the studied system in our work is binary-state, our future work is to extend the proposed method under the multi-state systems [33], [34], [35]. The curse of dimension of the number of focal elements should be carefully treated in the context of multistate systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, two types of uncertainties are considered in engineering practice, that is, aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty 5 . The aleatory uncertainty is mainly caused by inherent randomness and mainly quantified by probabilistic measures, whereas the epistemic uncertainty is raised from lack of knowledge, scarcity of data, ambiguity, subjectivity, and dubious information, 6 and is mainly quantified by Bayesian approaches, 7 interval theory, 5,8 fuzzy theory, 9–11 and the theory of belief functions 12,13 . Traditional reliability assessment methods are conducted based on probabilistic models by leveraging a large quantity of time‐to‐failure data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%