2013
DOI: 10.1515/agph-2013-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G.C. Lichtenberg on Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity

Abstract: Abstract:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 I do not claim this to be the only or the most exegetically accurate interpretation of Lichtenberg's objection to the cogito , though see Tester (2013) for a defence. As I am understanding it here, the dispute between the ‘Cartesian’ and the ‘Lichtenberg’ view rests on three substantive presuppositions: first, that we can be introspectively aware of our own mental states (or, equivalently, that there is such a thing as introspective awareness); second, that we can sensibly ask what one can know or justifiedly believe on the sole basis of introspective awareness (or, equivalently, that we can isolate the contribution of introspective awareness from that of other epistemic sources); third, that, even if forming the belief that one exists on the basis of one's introspective awareness of one's own conscious thinking is a reliable method for forming true beliefs, there remains a question as to whether the beliefs formed through this method are justified (or, equivalently, that there is a workable notion of epistemic justification that is not purely reliabilist).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“… 1 I do not claim this to be the only or the most exegetically accurate interpretation of Lichtenberg's objection to the cogito , though see Tester (2013) for a defence. As I am understanding it here, the dispute between the ‘Cartesian’ and the ‘Lichtenberg’ view rests on three substantive presuppositions: first, that we can be introspectively aware of our own mental states (or, equivalently, that there is such a thing as introspective awareness); second, that we can sensibly ask what one can know or justifiedly believe on the sole basis of introspective awareness (or, equivalently, that we can isolate the contribution of introspective awareness from that of other epistemic sources); third, that, even if forming the belief that one exists on the basis of one's introspective awareness of one's own conscious thinking is a reliable method for forming true beliefs, there remains a question as to whether the beliefs formed through this method are justified (or, equivalently, that there is a workable notion of epistemic justification that is not purely reliabilist).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%