G20 Governance of Digitalization

Kirton, John; Warren, Brittaney

doi:10.17323/1996-7845-2018-02-02

Cited by 24 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, simplicity, guidance materials structuring and consistent production are the main advantages of this architecture that integrates different frameworks. knowledge in one shot [19]. IT Governance repositories are a set of knowledge sources capitalized by experts for better Information system management in different types of organizations.…”

Section: Cobit Knowledge Basementioning

confidence: 99%

IT GRC Smart Adviser: Process Driven Architecture Applying an Integrated Framework

Chergui¹,

Chakir²

2020

Adv. sci. technol. eng. syst. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is a continuation of the work presented in the Third World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems Security and Sustainability (WorldS4). In this version we focus on matching IT and business processes from different management levels by using IT-Governance (ITG) Risk and Compliance frameworks in a smart way. In fact, every information system (IS) has two main interfaces with two key systems: Operating System (OS) and Decision System (DS). Every system has his own frameworks and best practices for efficient management. IT Governance is the ability to control IT strategy implementation by ensuring business and IT alignment for profitable digital services. Also, the variety of IT Governance frameworks for each hierarchical level in the enterprise, should be efficiently deployed together in order to have coherent recommendations for IS, OS and DS users. It is why we use COBIT 5 as a strategic IT Governance framework able to match and integrate other frameworks and best practices dealing with IT services, IT risks and compliance as well. We based the proposed IT GRC smart adviser on artificial intelligence and knowledge management as technical axes. This article presents, IT Governance frameworks, their matching problems and related works. Then it proposes a smart architecture with new functionalities to match COBIT processes with other frameworks in order to cover different management levels. The technical contribution of this article is to propose and implement an IT GRC smart adviser based on many frameworks and best practices to optimize and improve IT Strategies. The simulation was presented, the obtained results were compared to human experts' decisions and big similarities were observed. The aim of this article is to integrate knowledge from many IT GRC frameworks for better IT governance in a smart and easy way.

show abstract

Section: Cobit Knowledge Basementioning

confidence: 99%

IT GRC Smart Adviser: Process Driven Architecture Applying an Integrated Framework

Chergui¹,

Chakir²

2020

Adv. sci. technol. eng. syst. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many researchers consider innovations, information technologies and the society informatization as key factors of globalization [15], [16]. E-commerce is considered an important tool for managing crisis amid globalization [17].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects for the Development of Online Trade in the Russian Federation in the Context of Globalization and the Information Society Establishment

Ramazanov¹,

Ramazanov²,

Panasenko³

et al. 2019

IJRTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The modern trade exists in the context of globalization and the information society establishment. The authors review the development of online trade in the Russian Federation and put the following research questions: how is the information and communication environment established in Russia? is there a link between the economic, information, communication and trade globalization, on the one hand, and the development of digital technologies in the trade sector, on the other hand? what are the prospects for the development of Russian digital trade in the global space? The results have indicated that the use of personal computers, local computing networks, and landline telephone networks in the Russian Federation has reached a level where a further increase in their number is not accompanied by an adequate increase in digital competencies. As a result of the study, the authors have found a relationship between the public activity in online trade and the development of the information society. They have also identified the factors that contribute to positive changes in the structure of Internet use by the population of the Russian Federation to order goods and services; factors hindering the development of online trade; and factors that do not influence the development of online trade. Regardless of the weak and deteriorating legal environment and the low efficiency of investment in innovation, the information society establishment and the development of online trade and the digital economy in the Russian Federation have positive dynamics supported by the activity of global players in the online space.

show abstract

“…It is very important that this G20 capacity is not lost as digital transformation issues are integrated into the agenda on sustainable, balanced and strong growth. Such risks are obvious, given the G7's technological lead ership and its desire to retain advantage in terms of digital economy development and control over performing global governance functions related to digitalization [Kirton, Warren, 2018].…”

Section: Coordination Of Macroeconomic Policiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The G20, G7 and BRICS in Global Economic Governance

Ларионова¹,

Shelepov²

2019

IORJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Group of 20 (G20), established to overcome the 2008 financial and economic crisis, has asserted itself as the premier forum for international economic cooperation and the most representative and authoritative mechanism for coordinating positions and forging collective decisions on economic policy issues. Members of the Group of 7 (G7) and the BRICS grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa-the oldest club of developed industrial economies and the youngest club of the largest emerging economies-coordinate within the G20. It is argued that in the process of consensus building in the G20, advanced and developing countries form new ad hoc groupings on specific issues which temporarily supersede the existing alliances, such as the G7/8 and BRICS, and allow them to pursue decisions conforming to their national interests. This article reviews the positions of, and coalition building by, G7 and BRICS members in the process of forging decisions on issues historically central to the G20's agenda: international financial institutions reform, macroeconomic policy and financial regulation. The authors explore the role that BRICS and G7 alliances played in advancing their members' priorities in G20 decisions. Have ad hoc groupings of advanced and developing economies indeed replaced the traditional alliances? Was BRICS successful in using cooperation within the G20 to rebalance power and change the rules of the game in the global system? Has the G7 managed to maintain and consolidate its influence in the renewed system of global economic governance? What resources does BRICS possess to compensate for its deficit of influence on G20 decisions in order to achieve a more democratic and equitable multipolar world order and ensure sustainable, strong, balanced and inclusive growth? The findings show that, despite contradictions within the alliances and common interests between BRICS and some G7 members on a number of issues, ad hoc groupings of advanced and developing countries do not replace the existing clubs. The members of the G7 successfully use coordination within their club to resolve internal contradictions, develop a common position and jointly promote it in the G20. The G7 ensured the strengthening of the international financial institution (IFI) system, and its influence in it, through cooperation with new centres of power, allowing a slight increase in International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank (WB) quotas and votes shares for BRICS, while still maintaining its control over the governance of IFIs. Both alliances influenced G20 decisions to stimulate economic growth while maintaining price stability and ensuring financial sustainability. On managing exchange rates, BRICS and the G7 acted as partners in the 1 The editorial board received the article in August 2018. The article draws on the results of the RANEPA project "Analysis of Opportunities for Aligning BRICS Countries' Positions on Key Issues of the Global Agenda," which explored the spheres of international finan cial and monetary system r...

show abstract

G20 Governance of Digitalization

Cited by 24 publications

References 0 publications

IT GRC Smart Adviser: Process Driven Architecture Applying an Integrated Framework

IT GRC Smart Adviser: Process Driven Architecture Applying an Integrated Framework

Prospects for the Development of Online Trade in the Russian Federation in the Context of Globalization and the Information Society Establishment

The G20, G7 and BRICS in Global Economic Governance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About