2015
DOI: 10.1177/1533034615576829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gain Correction for an X-ray Imaging System With a Movable Flat Panel Detector and Intrinsic Localization Crosshair

Abstract: Gain calibration for X-ray imaging systems with a movable flat panel detector and an intrinsic crosshair is a challenge due to the geometry-dependent heel effect and crosshair artifact. This study aims to develop a gain correction method for such systems by implementing the Multi-Acquisition Gain Image Correction technique. Flood field images containing crosshair and heel effect were acquired in 4 different flat panel detector positions at fixed exposure parameters. The crosshair region was automatically detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by the beamstop) have significantly different responses from exposed pixels when used again after a change in the setup, and will display an artifact such as an apparent shadowing on the detector. In medical imaging using similar detectors, it is known that simply translating the detector results in erroneous apparent shadowing of an imaged object (Park & Sharp, 2015), also resulting in the need for flat-field corrections (FFCs). The limitations of these detectors when used in medical and industrial imaging are well known, with numerous approaches taken to correct for them (Park et al, 2014;Cao & Peter, 2008;Hofmann et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introduction 1motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by the beamstop) have significantly different responses from exposed pixels when used again after a change in the setup, and will display an artifact such as an apparent shadowing on the detector. In medical imaging using similar detectors, it is known that simply translating the detector results in erroneous apparent shadowing of an imaged object (Park & Sharp, 2015), also resulting in the need for flat-field corrections (FFCs). The limitations of these detectors when used in medical and industrial imaging are well known, with numerous approaches taken to correct for them (Park et al, 2014;Cao & Peter, 2008;Hofmann et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introduction 1motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main experimental parameters are shown in Table 1 . The offset and gain corrections of the LAD are accomplished in advance to avoid dark field noise and response non-uniformity of the detecting units [ 37 39 ]. Geometrical calibrations such as focus to detector distance, center of rotation, and pixel size are also necessary to measure for an accurate image reconstruction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 10 minutes, collecting the original bright field plots of the three sets as follows : TABLE I. THREE SETS OF TESTING SCHEME TABLE Dose 70Kv5mAs Exposure time 2s 3s 6s 10s 20s 30s Dose 65Kv5mAs Exposure time 2s 6s 10s 20s 30s Dose 60Kv5mAs Exposure time 2s 6s 10s 20s 30s  The gain_map template is generated form 70Kv5mAs bright-field image in 2s/3s exposure time window, 0.5s and 5s pre-offset template are used to do linear fitting and 3 suitable time interval pre-offset templates are used to do quadratic function [5]. This two type of functions are used to calibrate the original bright-field image.…”
Section: A Test Methods and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%