1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00055-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
148
3
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
20
148
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the extent to which overground walking can be likened to treadmill walking is debatable, with contradictory results in the literature for many gait measures (Riley et al, 2007;Stolze et al, 1997;Alton et al, 1998). To this end, in addition to the distinct walking surface, its dimensions and movement, and the visual constraints associated with treadmill walking (Stolze et al, 1997;Nigg et al, 1995;Dingwell et al, 2001), handrail support may or may not be implemented. On the other hand, overground walking provides more familiar optic flow feedback and the option to freely modulate gait.…”
Section: Locomotor Modalities In Rehabilitation and Research 241 Ovmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the extent to which overground walking can be likened to treadmill walking is debatable, with contradictory results in the literature for many gait measures (Riley et al, 2007;Stolze et al, 1997;Alton et al, 1998). To this end, in addition to the distinct walking surface, its dimensions and movement, and the visual constraints associated with treadmill walking (Stolze et al, 1997;Nigg et al, 1995;Dingwell et al, 2001), handrail support may or may not be implemented. On the other hand, overground walking provides more familiar optic flow feedback and the option to freely modulate gait.…”
Section: Locomotor Modalities In Rehabilitation and Research 241 Ovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would likely have diminished over the 10-minute trial, contributing to a time-dependent change in a subject's stride interval as he or she became more familiar and confident with treadmill walking. A number of studies comparing overground and treadmill walking have also identified biomechanical differences in gait (Alton et al, 1998;Stolze et al, 1997;Nigg et al, 1995;Murray et al, 1985;Van Ingen Schenau, 1980;Riley et al, 2007;Savelberg et al, 1998;Dingwell et al, 2001;Matsas et al, 2000). These are largely explained in terms of mechanical differences in the walking surface, the loss of optic flow feedback, the constant-speed constraint, and behavioural adjustments to a less familiar task.…”
Section: A Locomotor Control Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be that transition-speed is changed by the use of the treadmill [33,39] because: (1) the treadmill induces changes in kinematic variables which are associated to gait transition, i.e. foot and ankle angle [35,36], (2) power flows from the athlete to the treadmill and vice versa [35,37] and (3) spatiotemporal characteristics are influenced by the treadmill [36,38]. Furthermore, studying transition overground enables ground reaction force measurements using the standard technology of force plates.…”
Section: Rwtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the range of hip motion in the treadmill walking is smaller than that in the over ground walking. This result is due to the subjects in the treadmill walking tend to shorten their step on the moving belt [16]. Similar to the spatio-temporal parameter, the kinematic parameters between normal and amputee subjects is also different, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%