2022
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2021.3097892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait and Respiration-Based User Identification Using Wi-Fi Signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of our proposed method is higher than the other three methods. Our method is 3:7% higher than the traditional VMD scheme, 6:7% higher than the literature [16], and 4:3 % higher than the literature [17], respectively.…”
Section: Person Identification Accuracymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of our proposed method is higher than the other three methods. Our method is 3:7% higher than the traditional VMD scheme, 6:7% higher than the literature [16], and 4:3 % higher than the literature [17], respectively.…”
Section: Person Identification Accuracymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Furthermore, we compare RF-Gait with variational mode decomposition and two state-of-art gait-based person identification methods [16,17] which are empirical mode decomposition-based methods in Figure 11. The accuracy of our proposed method is higher than the other three methods.…”
Section: Person Identification Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Wi-Fi sensing is still a developing area of research and there are still many challenges to overcome. The two main identified problems are related to performance [8,14,15] and user convenience [16][17][18][19]. The accuracy ranges from 90-80%, often reducing as the number of participants increases-90% was only for a small number of participants, that is, around 11 people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HumanFi [16] asks the user to collect 40 samples of walking back and forth in a straight line; Lin et al [18] asked for 140 h of data collection of 20 different types of human activity. Wang et al [17] explored the combination of gait and breathing; however, they required 18 samples from each participant standing for 15 s per sample. In the studies that have been conducted, background interference was not considered, and it is currently not known how the accuracy might improve in a controlled environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%