2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait event detection for use in FES rehabilitation by radial and tangential foot accelerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
86
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accelerometers can be an alternative method to detect gait events. Depending on the nature of the algorithm and location of the accelerometer, latency and detection rate were found to be ranging between 138 ms and 586 ms and between 95% and 109.4% respectively [1,24,25]. However, accelerometer readings are affected by gravity and require exact placement of the accelerometer on human body segment to ensure consistent performances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accelerometers can be an alternative method to detect gait events. Depending on the nature of the algorithm and location of the accelerometer, latency and detection rate were found to be ranging between 138 ms and 586 ms and between 95% and 109.4% respectively [1,24,25]. However, accelerometer readings are affected by gravity and require exact placement of the accelerometer on human body segment to ensure consistent performances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is quite likely that external factors might disturb the original configuration during long-term analysis [28], and thus either the axis alignment should be checked and readjusted frequently or the exact orientation of the accelerometer must be known throughout, to compensate for the misalignment of the axes. An alternative is to analyze the magnitude of the resultant accelerometer signal instead which makes it invariant to individual axis alignment, as done in [4], [29]. While some methodologies instruct subjects to walk in a straight line or a given path at a selfselected pace [4], [13], [27], [29], others either pre-define a set of walking speeds or ask the subjects to walk slowly, normal and fast, in order to test the algorithmic robustness to different velocities [3], [14], [24]- [26], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is to analyze the magnitude of the resultant accelerometer signal instead which makes it invariant to individual axis alignment, as done in [4], [29]. While some methodologies instruct subjects to walk in a straight line or a given path at a selfselected pace [4], [13], [27], [29], others either pre-define a set of walking speeds or ask the subjects to walk slowly, normal and fast, in order to test the algorithmic robustness to different velocities [3], [14], [24]- [26], [28]. A number of algorithms apply thresholds either to filtered accelerometer signals or use them at some intermediate stage after signal transformation, to perform peak detection for identifying events [25], [28], [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gait event identification can be used to control the on/off time of functional electrical stimulation devices for drop foot correction in stroke patients [1,2,3,4], operate an active orthotic device for ankle foot pathologies [5], assess rehabilitation effects in post-stroke patients with gait abnormality [6], and classify daily activity to aid exercise for health care in the elderly [7]. Toe off (TO) and heel strike (HS) are two key gait events commonly used to distinguish a gait cycle into either swing phase or stance phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%