2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/humanoids.2017.8246926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait generation via intrinsically stable MPC for a multi-mass humanoid model

Abstract: We consider the problem of generating a gait with no a priori assigned footsteps while taking into account the contribution of the swinging leg to the total Zero Moment Point (ZMP). This is achieved by considering a multi-mass model of the humanoid and distinguishing between secondary masses with known pre-defined motion and the remaining, primary, masses. In the case of a single primary mass with constant height, it is possible to transform the original gait generation problem for the multi-mass system into a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal trajectory is then updated real-time with sensor measurements. MPC enhances the expressivity capabilities of the motion generator and gives more compliance to the robot that can react to external unexpected contact events [26], [27]. The only drawback of using an MPC approach in a teleoperation framework is the underlying computational cost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal trajectory is then updated real-time with sensor measurements. MPC enhances the expressivity capabilities of the motion generator and gives more compliance to the robot that can react to external unexpected contact events [26], [27]. The only drawback of using an MPC approach in a teleoperation framework is the underlying computational cost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For compactness, we do not discuss in detail the module which provides the swing foot trajectory. It uses polynomial functions whose endpoints are adjusted in order to match the footstep positions, for example, see(Scianca et al, 2017).5 Having two different horizons for planning and control is a common occurrence, as the window over which the planner operates is generally independent of the window over which the MPC optimizes. In fact, the first can range from a few steps up to the total duration of the locomotion task, while the second is usually much shorter in order to make the problem computationally tractable online.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 For compactness, we do not discuss in detail the module which provides the swing foot trajectory. It uses polynomial functions whose endpoints are adjusted in order to match the footstep positions, for example, see ( Scianca et al, 2017 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%