2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy Clustering in the Completed SDSS Redshift Survey: The Dependence on Color and Luminosity

Abstract: We measure the luminosity and color dependence of galaxy clustering in the largest-ever galaxy redshift survey, the main galaxy sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Seventh Data Release (DR7). We focus on the projected correlation function w p (r p ) of volume-limited samples, extracted from the parent sample of ∼ 700, 000 galaxies over 8000 deg 2 , extending up to redshift of 0.25. We interpret our measurements using halo occupation distribution (HOD) modeling assuming a ΛCDM cosmology (inflationary … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

176
1,329
23
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 794 publications
(1,530 citation statements)
references
References 239 publications
(318 reference statements)
176
1,329
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact is in general agreement with the weaker clustering of blue galaxies in comparison with red galaxies (e.g. Zehavi et al 2011).…”
Section: Selection Of Galaxy Group Candidates and Sfcg Cataloguesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This fact is in general agreement with the weaker clustering of blue galaxies in comparison with red galaxies (e.g. Zehavi et al 2011).…”
Section: Selection Of Galaxy Group Candidates and Sfcg Cataloguesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More massive or more luminous galaxies are more strongly clustered because they reside in more massive halos that have higher b h (M ). At low redshift, the large scale bias factor is b g ≤ 1 for galaxies below the characteristic cutoff L * of the Schechter (1976) luminosity function, but it rises sharply at higher luminosities Zehavi et al, 2005Zehavi et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Cmb Anisotropies and Large Scale Structurementioning
confidence: 94%
“…For a galaxy sample defined by a threshold L min in optical or near-IR luminosity (or stellar mass), theoretical models and empirical studies (too numerous to list comprehensively, but our summary here is especially influenced by Kravtsov et al 2004;Conroy et al 2006;Zehavi et al 2011) suggest the following approximate model. The minimum host halo mass is the one for which the comoving space density n(M min ) of halos above M min matches the space density n(L min ) of galaxies above the luminosity threshold.…”
Section: Cmb Anisotropies and Large Scale Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include optically-selected SDSS QSOs at 0 < z < 3 (Myers et al, 2006;Ross et al, 2009) Lyman-break galaxies (Adelberger et al, 2005), MIPS 24 µm-selected star-forming galaxies at 0 < z < 1.4 , AGES and DEEP2 red and blue galaxies at 0.25 < z < 1 from the AGES (Hickox et al, 2009;Coil et al, 2008) SDSS-selected luminous red galaxies (LRGs) at 0 < z < 0.7 (Wake et al, 2008), and optically-selected galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.3 (Estrada et al, 2009). The figure also shows the r 0 for low-redshift galaxies with r-band luminosities in the range 1.5 to 3.5 L , derived from the luminosity dependence of clustering (Zehavi et al, 2011). Dotted lines show r 0 versus redshift for dark matter haloes of different masses.…”
Section: Clustering Of Dsfgsmentioning
confidence: 99%