2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game-theoretic modeling and optimization of multi-echelon supply chain design and operation under Stackelberg game and market equilibrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the proposed model and solution approaches could be easily extended to consider other uncertainties, such as prices, demands, and property parameters. Moreover, instead of assuming a cooperative model, we may consider addressing the noncooperative case using game theoretical modeling approach, 58 which will be addressed in a future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the proposed model and solution approaches could be easily extended to consider other uncertainties, such as prices, demands, and property parameters. Moreover, instead of assuming a cooperative model, we may consider addressing the noncooperative case using game theoretical modeling approach, 58 which will be addressed in a future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They developed one centralized pricing and seven decentralized pricing models. [40] investigated a multi-echelon supply chain where interactions among supply chain members were captured under the generalized Nash equilibrium assumption.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies published so far treat this topic very partially. We believe that in the future should be deepened in some aspects related to the Theory of Games and that the equilibrium solutions will be a very interesting field to develop (see Yue and You, 2014). Moreover schemes based on the establishment of a comprehensive planning framework within which the member organizations establish their own plans harmonically must deepen and extend the traditional decompositions of Dantzig-Wolfe and Benders, or similar techniques in context of wider programming.…”
Section: Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%