Gamma Oscillations as a Neural Signature of Shifting Times in Narrative Language

Abstract

Verbs and other temporal expressions allow speakers to specify the location of events in time, as well as to move back and forth in time, shifting in a narrative between past, present and future. The referential flexibility of temporal expressions is well understood in linguistics but its neurocognitive bases remain unknown. We aimed at obtaining a neural signature of shifting times in narrative language. We recorded and analyzed event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and oscillatory responses to the adverb ‘now’ and to the second main verb in Punctual (‘An hour ago the boy stole a candy and now he peeled the fruit’) and Iterative (‘The entire afternoon the boy stole candy and now he peeled the fruit’) contexts. ‘An hour ago’ introduces a time frame that lies entirely in the past, ‘now’ shifts the narrative to the present, and ‘peeled’ shifts it back to the past. These two referential shifts in Punctual contexts are expected to leave very similar traces on neural responses. In contrast, ‘The entire afternoon’ specifies a time frame that may encompass past, present and future, such that both ‘now’ and ‘peeled’ are consistent with it. Here, no time shift is required. We found no difference in ERPs between Punctual and Iterative contexts either at ‘now’ or at the second verb. However, reference shifts modulated oscillatory signals. ‘Now’ and the second verb in Punctual contexts resulted in similar responses: an increase in gamma power with a left-anterior distribution. Gamma bursts were absent in Iterative contexts. We propose that gamma oscillations here reflect the binding of temporal variables to the values allowed by constraints introduced by temporal expressions in discourse.

The Oscillopathic Nature of Language Deficits in Autism: From Genes to Language Evolution

“…We will assume also that Spell-Out/Transfer is realized through embedding such γ rhythms inside the θ band, the source of which is found in the hippocampus. This perspective is supported by the recent finding that γ bursts “reflect the binding of temporal variables to the values allowed by constraints introduced by temporal expressions in discourse” (Brederoo et al, 2015 ) and by Meyer et al’s ( 2015 ) EEG study suggesting that frontal-posterior θ oscillations reflect memory retrieval during sentence comprehension. Murphy ( 2015a ) speculated that Transfer is also likely supported by the corpus callosum, following insights in Theofanopoulou ( 2015 ).…”

Movies and narratives as naturalistic stimuli in neuroimaging

“…Language-processing is among the first fields of neuroimaging research in which naturalistic stimuli were used ( Crinion et al, 2003 ; Lechevalier et al, 1989 ; Yarkoni et al, 2008a ; Zacks et al, 2001 ). In addition to neuroimaging methods such as fMRI, processing of natural speech has been examined via EEG ( Becker et al, 2013 ; Brederoo et al, 2015 ; Broderick et al, 2018 ; Manfredi et al, 2017 ). For several research questions in this field, fundamental advances have been achieved beyond insights from experiments utilizing non-naturalistic stimuli, as described below.…”

The power of neural oscillations to inform sentence comprehension: A linguistic perspective

“…The authors' interpretation was that the hypothetical situation described by counterfactuals is not fully integrated into the meaning representation, and thus gamma power as an index of semantic unification is lower. Brederoo et al (2015) investigated the neural signatures of time shifting in discourse (e.g., from past to present and back: An hour ago the boy stole candy and now he peeled the fruit) and found increased gamma at the second temporal term and the second verb (both in bold) in sentences with time shifts compared to sentences with consistent timing (no mental time shifting required: The whole afternoon the boy stole candy and now he peeled the fruit). They interpreted this gamma effect as reflecting binding of the temporal variables to the temporal context set up earlier in the discourse, thus adding to the bank of evidence suggesting a role for gamma oscillations as a general binding mechanism, especially when meaning is involved.…”