1982
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(82)90112-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma ray energies and 36Cl level scheme from the reaction 35Cl(n, γ)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The information obtained from the different spectra is displayed in Table 2. The energy calibration and the relative intensity calibration was determined with 36C1 lines of target 3 by comparison with the values of Krusche et al [14]. These calibrations were transfered via the Eu lines to the other spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information obtained from the different spectra is displayed in Table 2. The energy calibration and the relative intensity calibration was determined with 36C1 lines of target 3 by comparison with the values of Krusche et al [14]. These calibrations were transfered via the Eu lines to the other spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra were both energy-and efficiency-calibrated with respect to the 36C1 standard [15]. This was achieved by first calibrating the 36C1 transitions in the mixed spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respective capture cross-sections in the three relevant isotopes are o_(50V)=21_2 b+4 (see below), r (51V) = 4.9 (1) b and r (35C1) = 43.6 b [22], leading to ),-ray fluxes in Slv, 52V and 36C1 in the ratio of 1:100:75. These spectra contain nearly equal numbers of intense 52V and 36C1 transitions and permitted energy and efficiency calibration of the Ge-and pair-spectrometer with respect to the 36C1 standard [23]. As the neutron binding energy in 52V is similar to that of 36C1, the full energy range of the 36C1 lines was sufficient for this calibration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%