2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GAPORE: Boolean network inference using a genetic algorithm with novel polynomial representation and encoding scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better present the effect of the college English education model, this section also uses the original GA (genetic algorithm) [18,19] and BSA (backtracking search optimization algorithm) [20,21] foretell similar 15 groups of test set information in the sample information for comparative analysis. The evaluation outcomes of GA and BSA are displayed in Figures 4 and 5.…”
Section: Network Training and Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better present the effect of the college English education model, this section also uses the original GA (genetic algorithm) [18,19] and BSA (backtracking search optimization algorithm) [20,21] foretell similar 15 groups of test set information in the sample information for comparative analysis. The evaluation outcomes of GA and BSA are displayed in Figures 4 and 5.…”
Section: Network Training and Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, once A is constructed, detection and enumeration of singleton attractors become trivial [5] . Although most of existing STP-based methods need to handle or larger size matrices and thus can only handle small-size BNs, some efforts have been done to address this complexity issue [89] , [90] .…”
Section: Practical Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the systems biology point of view, inferring GRN plays an extremely crucial role in revealing underlying regulatory mechanisms to uncover potential genes ( Akutsu et al 2000 ; Zhang et al 2012 ; Liu et al 2021 ). A vast number of network inference/reconstruction methods have been widely developed to infer GRN using transcriptomic profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vast number of network inference/reconstruction methods have been widely developed to infer GRN using transcriptomic profiles. To the best of our knowledge, the existing network inference/reconstruction methods can be categorized into the following groups according to their principles ( Liu 2015 ): regression-based method [multiple regression model ( Zhang et al 2010 ), SINCERITIES ( Papili Gao et al 2018 ), and GNIPLR ( Zhang et al 2021 )], tree-based method [GENIE3 ( Huynh-Thu et al 2010 )], stability selection method [TIGRESS ( Haury et al 2012 )], correlation-based method [ARACNE ( Margolin et al 2006 ) and CLR ( Faith et al 2007 )], knowledge-based method [RegNetwork ( Liu et al 2015 )], ordinary differential equation method [linear ODE ( Wu et al 2014 ), SCODE ( Matsumoto et al 2017 ), and GRISLI ( Aubin-Frankowski and Vert 2020 )], Bayesian-based method [SSMs ( Beal et al 2005 ), Vireo ( Huang et al 2019 ), and NAE ( Wang et al 2022 )], Boolean network (BN) model method [ATEN ( Shi et al 2020 ) and GAPORE ( Liu et al 2021 )], and deep learning model [DeepDRIM ( Chen et al 2021 ), dynDeepDRIM ( Xu et al 2022 ), and DeepSEM ( Shu et al 2021 )].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%