bHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is the etiological agent for all cervical cancers, a significant number of other anogenital cancers, and a growing number of head and neck cancers. Two licensed vaccines offer protection against the most prevalent oncogenic types, 16 and 18, responsible for approximately 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide and one of these also offers protection against types 6 and 11, responsible for 90% of genital warts. The vaccines are comprised of recombinantly expressed major capsid proteins that self-assemble into virus-like particles (VLPs) and prevent infection by eliciting neutralizing antibodies. Adding the other frequently identified oncogenic types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 to a vaccine would increase the coverage against HPV-induced cancers to approximately 90%. We describe the generation and characterization of panels of monoclonal antibodies to these five additional oncogenic HPV types, and the selection of antibody pairs that were high affinity and type specific and recognized conformation-dependent neutralizing epitopes. Such characteristics make these antibodies useful tools for monitoring the production and potency of a prototype vaccine as well as monitoring vaccine-induced immune responses in the clinic. This major capsid protein self-assembles into virus-like particles (VLPs) that mimic the structure of the native virion (2, 3). The two currently licensed vaccines offer protection against HPV types 16 and 18, which account for 70% of cervical cancer cases (4); the quadrivalent vaccine also offers protection against HPV types 6 and 11, which account for 90% of genital warts (5). A second-generation HPV vaccine was developed by Merck to provide extended coverage for the next five most prevalent oncogenic HPV types: 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. Inclusion of VLPs to the additional five oncogenic HPV types will potentially increase the coverage to approximately 90% (4).Monitoring HPV type-specific neutralizing epitopes is an essential aspect of the development of this vaccine. A meaningful and rapid evaluation of serological responses facilitates decisions regarding the optimum vaccine and assists the collection of data for regulatory approval. Potency assays conducted in vivo (typically mouse potency assays) and functional in vitro assays such as pseudovirus and plaque assays can be laborious and difficult to standardize. Assays that utilize antibody binding and competition can act as valuable surrogates and can be readily qualified and adapted for high-throughput and automated platforms (6, 7). A critical requirement is that the antibodies that are chosen for the assays reflect the biological properties of the original potency and neutralization assays (8).Neutralizing antibodies to HPV L1 VLPs are primarily type specific (9) and bind to surface-exposed conformational loops (10). Despite high degrees of L1 sequence homology among members of the same family, neutralizing antibodies to cross-reactive epitopes have rarely been identified (11). Panels of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have be...