1993
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450710209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas hold‐up behavior of mechanically agitated gas‐liquid reactors using pitched blade downflow turbines

Abstract: Fractional gas holdup was measured in 0.57, 1.0, and 1.5 m i.d. vessels. Pitched blade downflow turbines (PTD) were used as the impeller. Design details of the impeller, such as the impeller diameter (0.22 T to 0.5 T) and blade width (0.25 D to 0.4 D), were studied. The effect of sparger type, geometry and size on fractional gas hold‐up has been investigated in detail. Four different types of spargers (pipe, conical, ring and concentric ring spargers) were used. Sparger location was varied for all the types st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both designs of the lower impeller, a 1.0 m ring sparger shows higher gas hold-up as compared to a 0.4 m diameter ring sparger. In conventional stirred vessels employing a PBTD impeller, Rewatkar and Joshi (1993) have reported that a ring sparger of diameter 2D gives a slightly higher gas hold-up as compared to a ring sparger having a diameter of 0.8D. In the present work, a ring diameter of 1.0 m corresponds to 2D whereas, a 0.4 m diameter corresponds to 0.8D.…”
Section: Fractional Gas Hold-up Parts C and D Ofmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For both designs of the lower impeller, a 1.0 m ring sparger shows higher gas hold-up as compared to a 0.4 m diameter ring sparger. In conventional stirred vessels employing a PBTD impeller, Rewatkar and Joshi (1993) have reported that a ring sparger of diameter 2D gives a slightly higher gas hold-up as compared to a ring sparger having a diameter of 0.8D. In the present work, a ring diameter of 1.0 m corresponds to 2D whereas, a 0.4 m diameter corresponds to 0.8D.…”
Section: Fractional Gas Hold-up Parts C and D Ofmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Gas hold-up has linear dependence on superficial velocity as described by Rewatkar et al [39] numerically and approved experimentally experimentally later by Kraume and Zehner [40] for glass beds suspended in water and by Laakkonen [41] for Xanthan solutions. In the current study, gas holdup was measured over the range of gas flow rates from 1 to 10 L/min at constant impeller speed of 400 rpm.…”
Section: Rheologymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Chakraborty et al [48] reported ceramics to be one of the most effective materials resulting into higher e g . The effect of the sparger ring diameter s has also been studied and found that spargers with 0.45d, 0.80d, 1.40d, and 2.0d dimensions are the most effective ones, where d represents impeller diameter [46,[49][50][51][52]. The effect of sparger location has also been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Laboratory Reactor Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Holland and Chapman [54] impeller and sparger also plays an important role. It has been reported that impellers placed near to spargers generate smaller bubble sizes leading to lower terminal velocity, v t with higher e g [47,50,53,55]. The diagram of a propeller type and a flat blade turbine type impeller are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Laboratory Reactor Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation