2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas holdup and flow regime in a bubble column that includes enhanced oil recovery chemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although increasing the surfactant concentration above the CMC and the addition of nanoparticles significantly decreased the ripening function A of the CO 2 foams shown in Figure b compared to foams generated at surfactant concentrations below the CMC, the coarsening rates were significantly high, as indicated from the n exponents ( n > 0.27) of A . This phenomenon matches the findings reported by Orlando et al and is attributed to the ability of the foaming solution/dispersion to generate foam bubbles of small radiuses because they were possessing low surface tension measurements of ∼37 mN/m with CO 2 at ambient conditions . Hence, the total surface area of the foam bubbles was high, and the gas diffusion between foam bubbles was more significant than the gas diffusion between larger foam bubbles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although increasing the surfactant concentration above the CMC and the addition of nanoparticles significantly decreased the ripening function A of the CO 2 foams shown in Figure b compared to foams generated at surfactant concentrations below the CMC, the coarsening rates were significantly high, as indicated from the n exponents ( n > 0.27) of A . This phenomenon matches the findings reported by Orlando et al and is attributed to the ability of the foaming solution/dispersion to generate foam bubbles of small radiuses because they were possessing low surface tension measurements of ∼37 mN/m with CO 2 at ambient conditions . Hence, the total surface area of the foam bubbles was high, and the gas diffusion between foam bubbles was more significant than the gas diffusion between larger foam bubbles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This phenomenon matches the findings reported by Orlando et al and is attributed to the ability of the foaming solution/dispersion to generate foam bubbles of small radiuses because they were possessing low surface tension measurements of ∼37 mN/m with CO 2 at ambient conditions. 51 Hence, the total surface area of the foam bubbles was high, and the gas diffusion between foam bubbles was more significant than the gas diffusion between larger foam bubbles. Finally, on the basis of the modeling results, the optimum foaming systems required for the generation of stable CO 2 were the utilization of 250 and 500 ppm of FAU nanoparticles dispersed with CTAB at a concentration of 750 ppm because they were able to stabilize the CO 2 foam by both retarding the bubble evolution as a result of coalescence and coarsening.…”
Section: Ctab Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%