1997
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690430605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas‐holdup measurements in bubble columns using computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
70
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
70
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some works report that the column diam-eter affects the gas holdup. Botton et al [17] report that gas holdup increases when the column diameter decreases, whereas Kumar et al [18] who conducted experiments in bubble columns with diameters larger than 10 cm, state that there is a continuous increase in the gas holdup with increasing column diameter. To the best of our knowledge, there are no experimental results concerning bubble columns with diameter less than 10 cm, equipped with fine porous sparger.…”
Section: Gas Holdupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some works report that the column diam-eter affects the gas holdup. Botton et al [17] report that gas holdup increases when the column diameter decreases, whereas Kumar et al [18] who conducted experiments in bubble columns with diameters larger than 10 cm, state that there is a continuous increase in the gas holdup with increasing column diameter. To the best of our knowledge, there are no experimental results concerning bubble columns with diameter less than 10 cm, equipped with fine porous sparger.…”
Section: Gas Holdupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gopal and Sharma [12] found that L/D ratio, column diameter and distributor design have no significant effect on gas holdup, interfacial mass transfer area, and liquid-side mass transfer coefficient in low L/D bubble columns. Kumar et al [1] also found no effect of the static liquid height on the overall gas holdup while the local gas holdup increases with the axial distance from the distributor. Other researchers found a decrease in gas holdup with an increase in static liquid height [4,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most traditional design of bubble column reactors favors a high height-to-diameter ratio (L/D) to allow system hydrodynamics to reach a fully developed state [1][2][3][4][5]. The gas distributor region is generally ignored in the scale-up considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of the gas holdup profile at different column heights seems to be unchanged at given gas velocity once the measurement has been taken at a certain distance from the distributor (2L/D or higher). Column diameter has been reported to have an effect on gas holdup profile (Kumar et al, 1997).…”
Section: Correlation Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%