2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas transfer velocities of CO2 and CH4 in a tropical reservoir and its river downstream

Abstract: International audienceWe have measured simultaneously the methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) surface concentrations and water–air fluxes by floating chambers (FC) in the Petit-Saut Reservoir (French Guiana) and its tidal river (Sinnamary River) downstream of the dam, during the two field experiments in wet (May 2003) and dry season (December 2003). The eddy covariance (EC) technique was also used for CO2 fluxes on the lake. The comparison of fluxes obtained by FC and EC showed little discrepancies mainly d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
190
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(100 reference statements)
18
190
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This in turn allows the computation of the ebullition CH 4 flux from the chamber CH 4 measurement that captures both ebullition and diffusive CH 4 fluxes. Chamber measurements have been assumed to provide biased k values 44 , although often comparing satisfactorily with atmospheric flux measurements 45,46 or infrared imaging of the water surface 47 . The obtained average k 600 in the Congo (12 ± 11 cm h −1 ) was not significantly different from the average in the Zambezi (10 ± 11 cm h −1 ) (unpaired t-test, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Ghg Flux Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn allows the computation of the ebullition CH 4 flux from the chamber CH 4 measurement that captures both ebullition and diffusive CH 4 fluxes. Chamber measurements have been assumed to provide biased k values 44 , although often comparing satisfactorily with atmospheric flux measurements 45,46 or infrared imaging of the water surface 47 . The obtained average k 600 in the Congo (12 ± 11 cm h −1 ) was not significantly different from the average in the Zambezi (10 ± 11 cm h −1 ) (unpaired t-test, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Ghg Flux Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air-water temperature difference reflected the thermal difference at the air-water interface. An increased air-water temperature difference promoted CO 2 emission from the reservoir surface under evaporative conditions due to the destabilization of the water surface (Guérin et al, 2007). For example, CO 2 flux was 4% higher under evaporative conditions in the Pacific Ocean (Ward et al, 2004).…”
Section: Environmental Variables Influencing Co 2 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flux of gas from water to air (diffusive emissions) was calculated as the product of the gas exchange coefficient for the particular gas in question and the difference between gas concentrations in surface water and air (Equation 1). This approach involves more uncertainty in estimations of GHG emissions and is only used if floating chamber measurements are not possible (Guerin et al 2007, IHA 2010.…”
Section: Thin Boundary Layer Flux Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated pre-impoundment river emissions using the measurements of emissions from free-flowing regions of the three major tributary rivers to the reservoir. These river emission rates were determined using the thin boundary layer method (see Guerin et al 2007, IHA 2010, due to boat access limitations and because the relatively high water velocities prevented use of the floating chamber.…”
Section: Pre-impoundment River Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation