“…[3,6,8,9,19, Nineteen of them are cross-sectional studies [3, 6, 8, 19, 21-24, 25-28, 30, 31, 35, 37-40], and the remaining eight are case-control studies [9, 29, 32-34, 36, 41, 42]. Serology was utilized as the detection method for H. pylori in 14 studies [8, 9, 21, 23, 25-27, 31-35, 38, 39], pathology in 4 [3,22,40,42], UBT in 4 [6,37], CLO in 6 [19,24,30,36], and combining UBT and CLO in 2 [28,29] A flow chart describing the process of study selection is shown in Figure 1. For the meta-analysis, data were extracted from twenty-seven studies with a total of 68,410 patients, and the pooled OR for colorectal adenoma related to H. pylori infection was 1.51 (95% CI 1.39-1.63), although there was significant heterogeneity (p < 0.001) ( Table 1 and Figure 2).…”