2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2000.tb00404.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastroduodenal tolerability of medium dose enteric‐coated aspirin: a placebo controlled endoscopic study of a new enteric‐coated formulation versus regular formulation in healthy volunteers

Abstract: We compared, in a cross-over study, the toxicity of 300 mg enteric-coated aspirin with regular aspirin used for the prevention of cardiovascular events. In terms of endoscopic haemorrhagic lesions, enteric-coated aspirin is less gastrotoxic than regular aspirin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is also important to confirm the difference of small intestinal toxicity between the different formulations of aspirin. Some studies have demonstrated that enteric-coated aspirin caused fewer gastroduodenal injuries than regular aspirin [22,23]; however, the difference in small bowel toxicity between these two formulations is unknown. Our report showed that the proportion of subjects with small bowel ulcer was increased in patients taking enteric-coated aspirin compared with those taking regular aspirin (56.3 vs. 16.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, it is also important to confirm the difference of small intestinal toxicity between the different formulations of aspirin. Some studies have demonstrated that enteric-coated aspirin caused fewer gastroduodenal injuries than regular aspirin [22,23]; however, the difference in small bowel toxicity between these two formulations is unknown. Our report showed that the proportion of subjects with small bowel ulcer was increased in patients taking enteric-coated aspirin compared with those taking regular aspirin (56.3 vs. 16.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fourth, our results might be affected by the formulation of aspirin. Enteric-coated aspirin causes less gastroduodenal injuries than regular aspirin [26, 27]. Considering that the small bowel proximal segment as defined by this study included the duodenal bulb, the formulation of aspirin might influence the distribution of the small bowel injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these data were confirmed by many other studies, usually small endoscopic studies in man [146,[229][230][231][232][233][234][235], they cannot rule out a bleeding risk that is (by definition) associated with the clinical use of aspirin in cardiocoronary prevention (see below). Importantly, the inhibition of platelet-dependent thromboxane formation and platelet function does not differ between enteric-coated and plain aspirin at doses of 100 mg/day or above [173].…”
Section: Gi Side Effects As Study End Points: Observationalmentioning
confidence: 77%