Background/Aim-Some endoscopic ultrasonographic (EUS) features have been reported to be suggestive of malignancy in gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours (SCTs). The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of these features for malignancy. Methods-A total of 56 histologically proven cases of SCT studied by EUS between 1989 and 1996 were reviewed. There were 42 gastric tumours, 12 oesophageal tumours, and two rectal tumours. The tumours were divided into two groups: (a) benign SCT, comprising benign leiomyoma (n = 34); (b) malignant or borderline SCT (n = 22), comprising leiomyosarcoma (n = 9), leiomyoblastoma (n = 9), and leiomyoma of uncertain malignant potential (n = 4). The main EUS features recorded were tumour size, ulceration, echo pattern, cystic spaces, extraluminal margins, and lymph nodes with a malignant pattern. The two groups were compared by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results-Irregular extraluminal margins, cystic spaces, and lymph nodes with a malignant pattern were most predictive of malignant or borderline SCT. Pairwise combinations of the three features had a specificity and positive predictive value of 100% for malignant or borderline SCT, but a sensitivity of only 23%. The presence of at least one of these three criteria had 91% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% predictive positive value. In multivariate analysis, cystic spaces and irregular margins were the only two features independently predictive of malignant potential. The features most predictive of benign SCTs were regular margins, tumour size <30 mm, and a homogeneous echo pattern. When the three features were combined, histology confirmed a benign SCT in all cases. Conclusions-The combined presence of two out of three EUS features (irregular extraluminal margins, cystic spaces, and lymph nodes with a malignant pattern) had a positive predictive value of 100% for malignant or borderline gastrointestinal SCT. Tumours less than 30 mm in diameter with regular margins and a homogeneous echo pattern are usually benign. (Gut 2000;46:88-92)
This study was done to understand the different available methods used to calculate colorectal transit times. A single abdominal radiograph is taken following six successive daily ingestions of the same number of identical radiopaque markers. This method correlates well (P less than 0.001) with that using a single ingestion of markers with daily x-ray films until total expulsion. In techniques used to measure colorectal transit time with multiple ingestion of markers, the number of days of ingestion depends on the kinetics of marker defecation. This was found to differ markedly in various groups of control subjects and constipated patients (P less than 0.001) and can be used to obtain reliable data, even in subjects with severe constipation. When they ingest 20 markers, constipated patients are found to retain eight or more markers three days after ingestion, and taking a plain film of the abdomen on that day is sufficient to make a diagnosis of constipation. Transit time studies are reproducible from month to month in patients with an irritable bowel syndrome. Control subjects who claim that their bowel habits are not modified by stress have shorter transit times, similar in both sexes, than those who say they are (P less than 0.001). This may explain why a large percentage of constipated patients have been found by most authors to have "normal" colorectal transit times. The choice of control subjects is thus a key element in studies of functional bowel motor disorders. Stool frequency and consistency, in health, correlate only to rectosigmoid transit time.
Lugol dye staining increases the sensitivity of esophageal endoscopy for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and cancer. The prevalence of dysplasia and cancer reached 9.9 % in group 1, and we therefore believe that an endoscopic screening program could be justified for patients with head and neck or tracheobronchial cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.