2006
DOI: 10.5387/fms.52.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mimicking Gynecological Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our patient had a tumor greater than 30 cm and a mitotic count of more than 5/50 HPF, so we expected a poor prognosis. This case is particularly unusual because of the extremely large tumor size (30 × 20 × 15 cm); others authors have reported mean GIST sizes of 6-10.6 cm [4][5][6][7][8]. In addition, the tumor had a very high mitotic count of up to 8-9/50 HPF and, as mentioned previously, arose from the sigmoid colon.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our patient had a tumor greater than 30 cm and a mitotic count of more than 5/50 HPF, so we expected a poor prognosis. This case is particularly unusual because of the extremely large tumor size (30 × 20 × 15 cm); others authors have reported mean GIST sizes of 6-10.6 cm [4][5][6][7][8]. In addition, the tumor had a very high mitotic count of up to 8-9/50 HPF and, as mentioned previously, arose from the sigmoid colon.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Around 15-50 % of patients with GISTs have metastatic disease [6]. Because of their histology, GISTs presenting as pelvic masses can be mistaken for gynecological disease, such as ovarian tumor or uterine leiomyoma [7]. The majority of GISTs have diameters of less than 10 cm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature has shown that a diagnostic dilemma prevails in cases similar to this. There are reported incidences where suspected gynecological neoplasms turned out to be GISTs [3][4][5][6]. Morimura et al [3] reported two cases of GISTs mimicking gynecologic neoplasms (preoperative diagnoses of ovarian fibrothecoma and subserosal leiomyoma).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are reported incidences where suspected gynecological neoplasms turned out to be GISTs [3][4][5][6]. Morimura et al [3] reported two cases of GISTs mimicking gynecologic neoplasms (preoperative diagnoses of ovarian fibrothecoma and subserosal leiomyoma). Similarly, Lee [4] reported a proven case of GIST that was initially diagnosed as ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, PDGFR-α mutations can explain response and sensitivity to imatinib in some GISTs lacking KIT mutations [6]. The best prognostic features are tumor size and mitotic activity; however, it does not predict the risk for disease progression and malignant potential accurately because of the scarcity of primary omental GIST [7][8][9][10]. There are a few reported cases of GISTs that involved gynecologic tract and presented as pelvic or omental masses, therefore mimicking primary omental or ovarian neoplasm [8,9,[11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%