1993
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.90.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge Field, Parity and Uncertainty Relation of Quantum Mechanics on S1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21,22,23]. In the formulation of Ohnuki and Kitakado [24,25] it was shown that there are in fact an infinite number of representations of the algebra of operators which can be understood in terms of a certain gauge field. These representations are classified by the value of a parameter α ∈ [0, 1) which specifies the gauge inequivalent representations and interpolates between the discrete eigenvalues in the operator spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,22,23]. In the formulation of Ohnuki and Kitakado [24,25] it was shown that there are in fact an infinite number of representations of the algebra of operators which can be understood in terms of a certain gauge field. These representations are classified by the value of a parameter α ∈ [0, 1) which specifies the gauge inequivalent representations and interpolates between the discrete eigenvalues in the operator spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we mention an interesting analogy between the failure of the Heisenberg's error-disturbance relations of Ozawa (13) and the subtle behavior of the Kennard-Robertson relation for the periodic boundary condition in box normalization. It is known that complications are associated with the uncertainty relations for periodic systems [17,18,19]. The one-dimensional Schrödinger problem with the periodic boundary condition ψ(−L/2, t) = ψ(L/2, t) in a box [−L/2, L/2] gives the universally valid Kennard-Robertson relation [20]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact the inequivalent irreps of Y are parametrized byα ∈ R/Z and are defined by (40) up to equivalences (see [15,16] or e.g. the more recent [12,21]). { e ilx √ 2π } l∈Z ⊂ C ∞ (S 1 ) is an orthonormal basis of L 2 (S 1 ) consisting of eigenvectors of p: ρα(p)e ilx = (l +α)e ilx .…”
Section: Decomposition and Irreducible Representations Of The Observamentioning
confidence: 99%