2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.104.123504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge-field production during axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
4
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerical solutions taking into account the backreaction from fermion currents have been recently considered in Refs. [39,51] which show that, for values of the ξ parameter for which the Schwinger effect becomes relevant, the numerical solution for the different quantities, in particular for the helicity, lies between the maximal and equilibrium estimates. This feature remains if the Bunch-Davies vacuum is damped by the conducting medium, even for extreme cases of very large damping, leading to very suppressed vacua.…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, numerical solutions taking into account the backreaction from fermion currents have been recently considered in Refs. [39,51] which show that, for values of the ξ parameter for which the Schwinger effect becomes relevant, the numerical solution for the different quantities, in particular for the helicity, lies between the maximal and equilibrium estimates. This feature remains if the Bunch-Davies vacuum is damped by the conducting medium, even for extreme cases of very large damping, leading to very suppressed vacua.…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…RHN decays and inverse decays at T ∼ M i then impose the conditions µ α + µ φ ≈ µ N i ≈ 0, which allows one to solve Eq. (2.9) for the three flavored B − L charges, α µ ∆α = −3/10 µ e , where µ e is related to the efficiency of gauge-field production during axion inflation [63,64]. While this is only a minimal example for one specific chargegenesis mechanism and one specific RHN mass range, it already illustrates three important properties of wash-in leptogenesis: It is (i) independent of CP violation in the RHN sector, (ii) can operate at RHN masses as low as 100 TeV, and (iii) is especially efficient in what is otherwise known as the strong-washout regime.…”
Section: Contributor: Kai Schmitzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, any large-ex can be used to search for this class of sig we considered the specific signals arising which the DM is absorbed by nuclear ta nals can probe DM masses down to an Me in existing data and significantly below wi lower-threshold experiments. If an atom absorbs enough energy from incoming DM the ionized electron may be searched for i signatures, known as S2, in TPCs [61][62][63] a schematic of the signal. Current xenontection experiments such as XENON1T [ as well as future ones such as XENONnT 4T [66], and DARWIN [67], are sensiti absorption of DM with masses in the sub electrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 4) is evolved self-consistently with the second Friedmann equation. As commonly done in the literature [15][16][17][18][57][58][59][60], we neglect the role of metric perturbations.…”
Section: Lattice Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%