2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.533425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge transformation in Einstein–Yang–Mills theories

Abstract: We discuss the relation between spacetime diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations in theories of the Yang-Mills type coupled with Einstein's General Relativity. We show that local symmetries of the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalisms of these generally covariant gauge systems are equivalent when gauge transformations are required to induce transformations which are projectable under the Legendre map. Although pure Yang-Mills gauge transformations are projectable by themselves, diffeomorphisms are not. Inst… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They were, however, the first to observe that an enlarged diffeomorphism symmetry group existed, and that it possessed a compulsory dependence on the lapse and shift [15]. The resulting classical diffeomorphism-induced canonical transformation group has recently been studied, also in models in which additional gauge symmetries are present [3,4,5,6]. Recognizing the existence of this symmetry we are able to complement the previous use of intrinsic coordinates with a demonstration that phase space variables constructed in intrinsic coordinates are indeed invariant under this group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were, however, the first to observe that an enlarged diffeomorphism symmetry group existed, and that it possessed a compulsory dependence on the lapse and shift [15]. The resulting classical diffeomorphism-induced canonical transformation group has recently been studied, also in models in which additional gauge symmetries are present [3,4,5,6]. Recognizing the existence of this symmetry we are able to complement the previous use of intrinsic coordinates with a demonstration that phase space variables constructed in intrinsic coordinates are indeed invariant under this group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are thus able to demonstrate in detail that our phase space invariants do not change when the coordinate time is altered under the action of the canonical diffeomorphism-induced symmetry group presented by J. Pons, D.C. Salisbury and L. C. Shepley. [3,4,5,6]. We construct invariants by choosing the evolving value of the scalar field as an intrinsic time, i.e., by establishing correlations between the scalar field and the spacetime metric components, including the lapse component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expressions (82), (83), (85) have this generic structure, although the first class property need not hold for the coefficients of the ξ A andξ A in the Rosenfeld-Noether generators above. Indeed, we expect that one needs to work with modified transformations in order to respect the Legendre projectability of the transformations [36]. These questions will be addressed in a future publication.…”
Section: Symmetry Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been implicitly used in a series of papers [24][25][26] that analyze the relationship between the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian descriptions of the gauge group structure for generally covariant theories. …”
Section: The Algebra Of Projectable Noether Symmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%